>>18485795 (pb)
take your own advice.
I'll do as I do.
just for the record: you targetted me and said falsehood about my post so I responded to defend myself
and I didn't take it low like you did.
if you slander a poster expect blow back.
PS: you're a shill
that is what happens when realestate development doesn't account for the low part being where the floods will be.
>>
see:
>>18485795 (pb)
and take your own advice.
again, you started it. I defended myself.
you took it to insults.
You slander me.
you're talking about yourself.
>I'll do as I do.
I've made my point.
anyone else who sees you will be able to know right away that your presence is toxic.
and now I will filter and not attend to you anymore.
DC needs to be disbanded.
the Federal district should include no domiciles.
the parts where residences are located should be ceded back to Maryland.
none. no one would live in the new area where the government is.
no special payouts to the locals.
no voting for foreigners.
no local mayor unaccountable to a state court.
there would still be a 'Washington' it just would not be a part of the 'District of Columbia', which would only include office building, mueseums, and agency buildings, but no 'citizens of DC'
you need to show that it did end up there.
that's a conjecture I've heard a bunch of times in the last 24 hours, but there is no sauce.
?
are you trying to add to the book?
what will I find out?
I'm not saying that the book isn't wonderful for Christians to dive deep into the symbolism and learn some things.
but to say it is about right now, well, that's a bit of a stretch, anon.
you put your statement is quotes.
there is a part where all souls worship God for a half an hour.
did you miss that part?
when everyone leaves the dance floor
the dancing usually is over
even if the band is still playing . . .
the band keeps playing and people hate the songs they play.
the stop participating.
your point: there are always new rubes for the fleecing?
Also, all that 'hands together love everyone, free love' was fine until they needed to pay for the drugs that they were all on.
then the band went back to their hotels and lead a double life and the band and family never mingled with the fans.
my point: it was all fake.
yes the fans could form a unit of loving people, deadheads were often that.
but the band and family? they let the disfunction and dissipation of their members continue because they didn't want the party to end for themselves.
it was cringe, in hindsight, most of their 'join hands' bullshit.
you tell me.
Q is Q.
it's not a bad that puts on shows and pretends to free love and meanwhile has a serious drug habit back at the hotel, and an entourage that doesn't mingle with the fans.
you don't know me or what I know.
stop trying to shame those who disagree or challenge you.
you don't farm in the house you live in. There would be too much humidity.
get people who know about farming to start farms, not some third world infiltrator who has it all handed to her.