Anonymous ID: 10910b March 12, 2023, 11:52 a.m. No.18493395   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3412 >>3428 >>3518

>>18493389

 

how would this be different than just bailing the bank out? Where does that money come from if the FDIC is insurance for those who have under, why are insurance policies valid at all if the government can just do shit like this?

Anonymous ID: 10910b March 12, 2023, noon No.18493446   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18493428

from what I have read they do not have enough money to cover all the eligible FDIC accounts let alone the ones that are not covered. Not sure who the insurance is backed by however. Then it becomes the question again of government getting involved in business and at the tax payer expense etc.

Anonymous ID: 10910b March 12, 2023, 12:16 p.m. No.18493533   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3556 >>3558 >>3587

Stupid question, but most banks also make loans to people, small business etc. What happens to those loans where the customer owes the banks for their loans, might even be home loans. Are those loans still on the books, how does a bank collect on the loan when the bank itself has failed?

Anonymous ID: 10910b March 12, 2023, 12:28 p.m. No.18493599   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3630 >>3643

>>18493556

 

There has been some success or at least cases brought against this practice, remember something about that during the housing crisis. There may be something in the contract it self that says that the contracts can be sold. Still a bullshit practice either way. Wonder if people just actively decided to all default at once what that would do also. When car payments and house payments are not made it cripples the economy. Just spitballing thanks for the answer.

Anonymous ID: 10910b March 12, 2023, 12:35 p.m. No.18493639   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18493619

they are just tracking what industries and companies that have already announced a problem and looking to see who their top investors are. This is why the government is saying they will protect all the assets even over 250k because of the people involved.