>>18511697 (lb)

>You are literally implying that being against certain or all flags would exclude humans, which is nonsense.

Yeah, that'd just be stupid, wouldn't it?

And we're all against Nazism since it is a subset of Neofeudalism, so attempting to use something like that would be antithetical to the board. Same with political party flags considering both parties work against the people. Again, that would be antithetical. Have any other arguments? These suck.

>>18511869

Tongue-in-cheek bible references are fun.

>>18511920

Do anons still open/close doors for ladies? Little things go a long way; even after 19 years.

>>18511986

Confused by the AI art.

>>18512163

Not getting better.