Seconded.
>There are valid reasons for not wanting anime on a board dedicated to preventing child exploitation.
Thank you, BO
← Same propaganda, just one aimed at children, and the other aimed at adults.
>Are any of the anime reaction images sexual in nature?
>They are silly and cute, care free and humorous.
>I don't see the problem with posting them.
Neck yourself.
>20:05:45
>20:05:45
Kek
This is the kind of stuff we're missing while tranime stirs up drama.
>For me, a matter of what's ok for a board aligned with Q work, and especially ok for baker on duty.
Anon's main gripe with tranime is the constant search for drama.
It purposely starts fights.
If demands "exact" answers as to what it's doing wrong, then deviates just enough to keep the drama flowing.
Anon would LOVE to filter, but then anon misses notables.
Does tranime's egotistical need for "reaction images" outweigh all the other anons' ability to filter?
That is the crux of the problem, as anon sees it.
The loli images are bad enough, image-wise, but the worst part is driving people away from the board with drama.