Anonymous ID: 4ad7fd March 15, 2023, 7:23 p.m. No.18515862   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18515728

>Still no rules

I believe BO stated to keep the anime

separate from the bakes

 

>I can still post anime reaction images

separately from bakes

 

>I sent BO an e-mail and he hasn't responded. So I'm all clear for now.

 

suggesting that your desired timeline is absolute and provides tacit approval. it does not.

 

>Why can't a baker use some anime reaction images?

because of the aforementioned reasons regarding filtering notables, and the bakes being associated with a persona of underage persons

 

>What is the real crisis at hand?

drama, shilling, diversionary tactics and hindering Qresearch with these types of slides

 

>Is this really a big deal?

so it would seem

 

>Are retards really this sensitive to a silly picture?

Choosing to associate people who disagree with you as a [insulting label] and putting thier disagreement under a banner of sensitivity (or emasculating behavior) and implying the pictures are 'silly' . This is a failed attempt to label other and persuade through compliance tactics. Classic Shilling tactics.

 

>Imagine for one second, being triggered by a literal cartoon.

Image for one second, coming to an anonymous image board created for the sake and being anonymous and putting this much effort into creating a non-anonymous persona over a known divisive issue. You are basically a shill

Anonymous ID: 4ad7fd March 15, 2023, 8:09 p.m. No.18516073   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6090 >>6091 >>6098 >>6113

The anime baker is choosing to inject cartoon images of underage girls into bakes and it is totally unnecessary. The anons do not have a burden of proof to explain why this should not happen, although there have been plenty of good arguments made against it, the anime baker has the burden of proof why he refuses to separate the activities when performing the volunteer function on the board dedicated to Qresearch.

 

+1 Make QR anonymous again