>>18516117 PB

>Review of results tomorrow night.

I did not see any replies yet, so I will not provide a full answer right now.

Here again is the original challenge regarding the video clip:

>Can you decode this?

>Can you offer evidence that the answer is not simply a coincidence?

>Reply with a whole or partial answer in any bread.

The challenge stands, and I will post a followup tomorrow night.

To decode the comm, you need to combine two separate pieces of information.

They yield a very nice conclusion.

Four additional connections point to the prior combo being more than a fluke.

But I am giving you at least one of those right now.

See Q860, in conjunction with the old QMAP title that gives it context.

That drop sets up a marker for a BOOM.

The topic of Trump's discussion activates that marker.

Can you find the rest?