>>18526964 pb
>Without freedom of speech, there can be no freedom of thought.
you got that exactly back-asswards.
without freedom of thought, freedom of speech is meaningless.
>What kind of gay LARP shit is that?
FWIW….
a skeptic took the birth dates and locations of a hundred or so semi-obscure historical figures (both good and bad) and gave them to professional astrologers to cast detailed astrological charts.
they were more than 90% accurate.
just sayin'….
>Sounds
oh… well then… what more does anyone need?
far be it from me to suggest empirical experimental evidence trumps how something "sounds" to highest ranking anon.
>You're not part of this discussion.
it's not a discussion, brianiac, it's a correspondence. words matter.
>Magellan Data Reveals Volcanic Activity on Venus
starfleet command detects kling-on activity on ur-anus.
(sry… couldn't resist)
>Everyone is free to think whatever they want about "The Party."
>They are not, however, free to speak with others about their thoughts and, thus, everyone is alone within a world of tacitly constructed insanity.
that level of psychobabble jargonspeak to say precisely nothing betrays the author as a lawfag, psychfag, or a politician. which is it?
be careful projecting YOUR culturally biased interpretation of facial expressions onto total foreigners.
>Without free speech, freedom of thought is irrelevant.
wanna bet? i can blow your fucking brains out without uttering a single word.
you are a perfect example of free speech absent thought. POINTLESS.
>It's a simple enough point that free thought is unnecessary as a right.
i never said that…
but maybe you should try telling that to the british woman repeatedly arrested for SILENTLY praying outside an abortion clinic.
>everybody everything
logical absurdities that lead directly to intractable paradoxes. practice constructive set theory.
>lack human judgement and experience.
sounds like every millennial and zoomer i ever met in a position of power or authority.
>He is evil.
he's not intelligent enough to be evil.
he couldn't beat a chicken at tic-tac-toe.
>Predicted by the AI itself.
my 3 yr old great-grandson says that he can do any of those jobs, too.
so what's yer point?
all smarter than elon.
DOING evil only demonstrates the capacity to be an obedient minion.
BEING evil is something else, entirely.
>I say IQ test says differently
which one?
the real one they stopped using 60 yrs ago?
or the latest dumbed down one that has all the questions cunts and niggers can't answer removed?
<legitimately believes murder is a novel idea/expression
never said that. simply gave the most basic example that freedom of thought is not dependent on freedom of speech.
>what an intellectual. I'd never considered simply shooting people I disagree with.
i guess that's what makes you so superior to the rest of us mere humans. it is and has been the central MO of homo sapiens since time immemorial. nowadays, we do it with industrial efficiency. as stanton friedman so succintly put it, our principal occupation is tribal warfare.
sry. einstein never took an IQ test. doubt if it would have been more than 100. he was a mediocre mathematician, at best.
mine, taken in the 50s, is 197. of course you won't believe that. either way, i'm done with your slide.
>Reading comprehension fren
reading comprehension yourself, dumbass
i was pointing out the pointlessness of an "estimated IQ"