Anonymous ID: f33a48 March 29, 2023, 7:19 p.m. No.18605507   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5569

>>18605252 pb

liar

dude claims he knows where I am

lame attempt at intimidation.

u fucks are so lame - no it doesn't

 

Why does the shill have to claim Assange is in "good shape"?

and that's n0t Julian Assange in the pic?

Guilty conscience?

I'm open minded, either way.

Though I tend to think it's real.

But I admit I don't know.

But to openly claim the photo is fake?

And use the reasoning "it didn't show up on TinEye.

ekkekkkke

Then say, "But no I looked at Google"

kekkkkekkkkkkekkkk

damn

Such an idiot shill lends credence to the idea the photo is authentic; unfortunately.

Jokers aren't Joking; They really kill people and fuck up the world, and laugh about it

No Joke

Anonymous ID: f33a48 March 29, 2023, 7:43 p.m. No.18605641   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5666 >>5912

>>18605619

What's the watermark say

FWIW it fails to really look like him

But for how long has he been gone?

Could easily be him.

might not rank "NOTABLE" without sauce.

That I can agree about.

but it could be "Notable" as

"plausible image surfaces of Assange"

no verification as of yet.

something like that.

Post it later with another Baker?

Anonymous ID: f33a48 March 29, 2023, 8:12 p.m. No.18605797   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5815

>>18605714

>>18605631

thinks it's a Jedi knight.

kekkkkekk

glowfag.

>>18605714

if you assume I'm a newbie, you'd be wrong

I give a fuck what they "say" about "QAnon" that's why I fail to walk on eggshells .. or be intimidated as to what I can write.

That's why I'm here, after all.

The "looking over the shoulder" doesn't seem like night crew? Seems like day shift.

FAKE NEWS are the ones who cover for crooks.

"Let them Bark"

"Notables" is less than all sacrosanct as people make it out to be.

And if you disagree there, it might mean you haven't been here consistently for a while? Or have a consitent opinon different from mine as to what is Notable.

Most of the Notables is close to crap, IMO. At least a good 20 - 50 percent.

Constant news reporting of the mainstream news never got in the way of research (If you think LBJ and Jack Valenti and the murder of Kennedy have nothing to do with today, you'd be wrong)

 

All I'm saying , and I'm still saying it.

You consider youself correct in your view that the image is fake.

Yet you don't really know that.

And you won't say "I don't know"

and that's a big problem for someone ostensibly in the field of research.

Anonymous ID: f33a48 March 29, 2023, 8:17 p.m. No.18605823   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18605714

They will make fun of "QAnon" regardless of what we say / write here.

Or what's in the Notables.

Sure avoid a "gotcha' moment; they love to do that, But it's not making nor breaking anything.

We are so far ahead here with the news, Whatever 'gotcha' moment they come up with, cannot change that.

Anonymous ID: f33a48 March 29, 2023, 8:43 p.m. No.18605973   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5992

>>18605866

you might mis-represent my argument.

pushing, digging, questioning.

Did I make my point?

I guess not

just to be clear.

People, most certainly researchers and scientists, need to be able to say "I don't know" And to know when they don't know.

That's the whole point.

I grateful to whoever's baking.

it's a lot of work

No time to really think or read carefully? often. So much garbage to scan.

Not easy.

I 'm very happy with the new BO. Whoever it picked For BV? Didn't one BV just erase a bunch of Notables?

anyway, it's unpaid positions.

BO saved the day, Much gratitude.

And doing a really good job.