Anonymous ID: cc29da April 2, 2023, 8:17 p.m. No.18630245   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0288

>>18630225

Im not being a dick but flynn did not serve 30.

 

If in context of flynn I'm just asking why you think so. And i was active in '18 when the deop happened anons assumed flynn. But after flynn played out and didn't match 30, no one had a good explanation. Except for 2030.

"Pain in 23" was treated the same.

Anonymous ID: cc29da April 2, 2023, 8:33 p.m. No.18630322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0370 >>0384

>>18630288

>they're relevant to the current issues at the time,

When Q says "reread the drops" (often) I have to side with "future proves past" meaning they are in fact predictive. Not to discount the current event but "double meanings exist" also carries weight.

Expanding thinking.

Etc.

It is plenty evident the future is being described in many posts. Exploring that possibility is all i am suggesting.

To be fair. Nobody but q knows exactly.

Thats the joy of plausible deniability