Open.Ink Launching Monday AM in conjunction with @truethevote
Gregg Phillips @greggphillips
Monday, @truethevote and @openink team up to bring this video from the Pit and much, much more from the Konnech story.
Ripping the veil of lies from Konnech…
Starts with we TTV Newsletter Monday morning at 0800 central.
Releasing entire video through open.ink. 4…3…2…1…
https://truthsocial.com/@greggphillips
Seth Keshel - “Captain K" @RealSKeshel
All of the linear political spectrums we grew up on are either wrong or out of date. Here is a new road map for understanding the TEN different voting blocs that give each party a starting point of 45%. Thanks for reading!
A Captain's Guide to the Modern Political Spectrum
APR 15, 2023
https://skeshel.substack.com/p/a-captains-guide-to-the-modern-political
Apr 15, 2023, 8:41 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@RealSKeshel/posts/110205709646770810
Beanz's Take on Kari Lake's case before AZ Supreme Court
Tracy Beanz @tracybeanz
🚨THREAD: There have been new filings in the @KariLake case at the AZ Supreme Court.
REFRESH: If you remember, Hobbs and Fontes asked the SC for sanctions against Lake, and the court gave dates for briefing. When Lake briefed, not only did they dispute the sanctions, but they used the opportunity to request a motion for consideration on the CoC issues and the 35,563 vote discrepancy; votes that Runbeck said they had and Maricopa said they didn’t.
First, I will share some of the response to the original Lake rebuttal brief, that I threaded above. Then, I will share the rebuttal to THAT made by @KariLake and her attorneys.
Elias, on behalf of Hobbs, uses the familiar buzzwords, like “Baselessly,” “Frivolous,” “peddle conspiracy theories” and “Sow distrust.” Hobbs argues that there is no factual basis for the claims Lake has made.
What I found interesting here is that they are not asserting in this first paragraph that Lake had never raised the claims before- the original reason for the sanctions. They have moved to attacking the CoC and injected ballots themselves- even though Lake used Hobbs own evidence to show that fact pattern.
He then goes on to impugn their own evidence, stating that she misrepresented two trial exhibits, and didn’t “develop or preserve this new argument by raising it in her first reply brief before the court of Appeals”
This just isn’t true. But at least they talked about the initial reason they requested sanctions now.
I am saying this in all honesty, when you have a strong argument, you don’t typically have to insult the other party in your pleading. Lake attorneys haven’t done this other than in response to taunts.
Again, here, Hobbs et al admit that Maricopa did not follow CoC procedures, stating that the number of ballots on the form from Maricopa County was merely an “estimate” of ballots, and that is why it doesn’t match the totals at Runbeck.
The problem is, they broke from CoC procedure, have admitted it over and over again, and if we had honest brokers, this WOULD be a “nail in the coffin.”
Make sure you read the next tweet.
THIS IS NOT PROPER PROCEDURE. If a ballot leaves Maricopa for Runbeck without being accounted for, we have completely lost Chain of Custody. There is no provision for laziness, or being “too busy” that allows Maricopa to IGNORE this.
They say that Lake has “failed to grasp” the fact that this was done. To the contrary, they have said this over, and over, and over again, from the very beginning. In court pleadings, the defense is brazenly and repeatedly arguing that Maricopa didn’t follow procedure (and by default) law.
This is their argument, in totality. They also add that even if what she is saying is true, it isn’t properly before the court and she is asking for a reconsideration improperly. They against state they are asking for sanctions. They say her claim has NO justification.
That is just blatant dishonesty.
Here is @KariLake response to what you just read. Importantly here, Hobbs had previously argued that the two exhibits Elias just said are not indicative of a problem, were actually very important. Hobbs argued that those exhibits PROVED that Maricopa “would be aware of any ballot inserted or rejected or lost in any part of the process.”
You can’t have it both ways. You can’t argue on the one hand that those forms are only estimates and so there is no good way to KNOW what was leaving Maricopa for Runbeck, and on the other hand, those forms are going to give Maricopa an accounting of EVERY SINGLE ballot and where it is along the way.
They then again ask the court to remand this issue back down to the trial court along with signature verification.
Lake argues that Hobbs and Fontes can’t all of a sudden reverse course and say their trail exhibits are meaningless estimates, when they argued to the court of appeals that those same exhibits would make Maricopa “aware of any ballot inserted or rejected or lost in any part of the process”
How would they know if all they had before they sent them off was an estimate? In reality, it’s likely they didn’t realize they were relying on inconsistent exhibits to make this argument when they made it at the appellate court.
Remember, Hobbs (joined by Fontes) argued that these two exhibits were meaningful in their defense. Now, they are walking that back because Lake is relying on them to PROVE HER CLAIMS.
I want to make sure the people in the back hear this- they contradicted themselves relying on THIS EVIDENCE to prove CoC, and THIS VERY EVIDENCE PROVES OTHERWISE.
It’s their evidence, people.
1of2
continued
“Respondents cannot have it both ways. Either Maricopa has no idea whether ballot were injected because its numbers in Trial Exhibits 33 and 82 cannot be compared for chain of custody purposes, or the numbers can be compared and show that Runbeck recorded scanning 35,563 more ballots than Runbeck recorded receiving. Either way, reconsideration is justified”
The footnote says a lot here; it isn’t that Lake didn’t argue this point, it’s that the appellate court chose to focus on a tweet from Maricopa instead of this part of the record. However, the appellate court accepted the argument that those trial exhibits were indicative of true CoC, so the fact that they erred is important.
A little slight at Hobbs/Fontes here:
“..makes grand statements about the integrity of our electoral democracy, it is Respondents - not Lake - that defend unlawful election conduct by switching arguments when it suits them”
And again- I am REALLY glad they keep hammering this home. Even if the 35,563 figure results in part from an estimate, the only reason there IS an estimate, is that Maricopa BROKE THE LAW and failed to count the ballots when the containers were opened AS REQUIRED. And, that many ballots is too high given the margin between the two candidates of 17,117 votes.
BECAUSE THEY BROKE THE LAW.
Now we get into the procedural, but it’s important so I am threading it here. The argument Elias has made is that this reconsideration seeks review of the entire case, flouts the courts order, was procedurally improper, and expands the proceedings.
If they would have made a separate motion for leave to file would have complied with the law.
…But, if they would’ve done that - THAT actually would’ve expanded the request. Lake didn’t ask for a review of the entire election contest, as argued. The fact they represented it that way is just more evidence of their blatant dishonesty.
They CLEARLY didn’t do that here, and if you are willing to be so dishonest as to write that in a brief before the highest court in AZ, what else are you dishonest about?
They don’t provide any reason to deny the procedural motions, and are wrong that reconsideration requires “new evidence or intervening change in the law”
Their VERY ARGUMENT in defense is that THEY BROKE THE LAW.
This isn’t hard. They have literally filed over and over admitting that they BROKE THE LAW.
In a case, if you fail to respond to an issue raised, you concede the issue is true. If you don’t argue back against it, it is a concession. Hobbs/Fontes failed to rebut two issues raised, hence, they are conceding those points to Lake.
First, The Court of Appeals recognized that 50 ballots might have been unlawfully injected at Runbeck, but found the number immaterial, given the vote margin and all other counts were dismissed. Now that the court remanded the signature verification, it’s possible that the CoC violation could include unlawful votes from that verification issue to make a material difference, which is true wherever the actual number is between 50-35,563 ballots.
And here, again, the CoC issue has been raised the entire time. They raised this specific claim as ARGUMENTS in support of an issue, that can be raised.
And finally, Lake requests the court grant her leave to seek the reconsideration of the denial of the Petition for Review with respect to the chain-of-custody issues.
If you appreciate the work we do at @UncoverDC we would love your support! Unlike corporate media, we rely on YOU to keep providing ACTUAL JOURNALISM. There are several options available at this link: https://www.uncoverdc.com/Support/
2of2
11:55 AM · Apr 15, 2023
https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1647267502508986368
https://twitter.com/DanCham03014042/status/1647000841293910021/photo/1
IF Massis wants this, WHY is he backing Deep State DeSanctimonious?
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie
Even until his last day in office, the deep state was able to keep Trump from pardoning @Snowden, #FreeJulianAssange, @RealRossU, and the January 6th protesters.
9:24 PM · Apr 15, 2023
https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1647410547812442113
>most people can't even handle simple truth.
Brian Cates ⭐️⭐️⭐️ @BrianCates
Very first Q drop Merkel was mentioned in, what was the theme?
Satan & Satanic activity is mentioned in only 12 Q posts out of more than 4,000.
Why did this have to be managed carefully?
Why does the public have to be slowly prepared for the final, most awful revelation of what's been going on?
Were most Americans ready to hear back in 2017 or 2018 that a Satan -worshipping cult runs the world and most of the big international threats - such as NK - are not REAL, but are managed actors driving a massive money-laundering machine profiteering on war, drug/human/arms trafficking?
I don't even think most people are readyto hear that the CIA/MOSSAD have been running North Korea since the beginning.
Or that NATO was set up so that the former Nazi generals in West Germany would have control of military policy in Central Europe.
Or that it was the CIA/MOSSAD that created, funded, equipped and directed the actions of ISIS in the Middle East, so as to supply a 'reason' to keep our military in Syrai, Iraq & Afghanistan after AQ was no longer a sufficient threat.
Apr 15, 2023, 3:52 PM
https://truthsocial.com/@BrianCates/posts/110204574981830678
Steven Cheung @CaliforniaPanda
.@fullsendpodcast x @realDonaldTrump in the house!
Don’t miss this episode.
8:10 PM · Apr 15, 2023
https://twitter.com/CaliforniaPanda/status/1647391884896096257/photo/1
Winning
Meghan Maureen @Keggs719
Democrats have no idea what women are.
Nikki Fried @NikkiFried
Republicans have no idea what women want.
7:25 PM · Apr 15, 2023
https://twitter.com/Keggs719/status/1647380551211311104
Kari Lake and Roger Stone Talk Arizona, Trump, and America's Future
Streamed on: Apr 13, 6:33 pm EDT 57:36
https://rumble.com/v2i1tw6-kari-lake-and-roger-stone-talk-arizona-trump-and-americas-future.html
This undated photo shows a terracotta figurine of Eros riding a dolphin found in a newly discovered sanctuary, which dates from the 5th century B.C., that was first identified in 2019 along the ancient city walls of Paestum, Southern Italy. The excavations of the sanctuary in the ancient city of Paestum have unearthed seven terracotta bull heads and a figurine of Eros riding a dolphin that shines new light on the religious life and rituals of the ancient Greek city, culture ministry officials said Saturday, April 15, 2023. (Paestum Velia Archeological Park via AP)
AP
Archeologists in Italy unearth ancient dolphin statuette
ROME (AP) — Excavations in southern Italy have unearthed terracotta bull heads and a figurine of the Greek god Eros riding a dolphin, shining new light on the religious life and rituals of an ancient city, culture ministry officials said Saturday.
It’s the first trove of artifacts identified from a sanctuary in the ancient Greek city of Paestum, which dates from the 5th century B.C. Paestum, famed for its three massive Doric-columned temples, is near the archaeological site of Pompeii, but farther down the Almalfi coast.
The small temple was first identified in 2019 along the ancient city walls but excavations were halted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Italian Culture Ministry said in a statement.
Excavations yielded several small terracotta figurines in the first months of resuming work, the Ministry said. Archeologists found seven bull heads found around a temple altar as if placed there on the ground in a form of devotion.
A dolphin statuette found in the first trove of artifacts appears to be from the Avili family of ceramists whose presence had never before been documented in Paestum, the statement said.
Limited excavations began at the temples in the 1950s, and the ministry believes more treasures can be found in the area.
Ancient Romans controlled the city by around 275 B.C., renaming it Paestum from the Greek “Poseidonia,” in what had before been Magna Graecia.
https://apnews.com/article/italy-paestum-pompeii-ancient-greece-6df3966e0e2636528e20d9f6d10e66ae
>CIA/MOSSAD have been running North Korea since the beginning.
That's why President Truman fired General MacArthur
…
[General Douglas MacArthur] assured the president that the Korean War would be short-lived and that the American troops would be home by Christmas. MacArthur was initially successful in driving back the North Korean forces over the 38th parallel. He made a controversial move, however, when he continued to push the North Koreans further north and suggested bombing cities in China that were thought to be aiding the North Korean troops. …
https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/firing-macarthur
Anheuser-Busch is very well aware that for over 3000 years, BEER was brewed almost exclusively (at home) by women, whether by Sumerian Women, Norse Women (Vikings), or by British Ale Wives (who supported Taverns). - Men took over Beer Brewing only when it became an Industry.
Crystal Hope @CrystalHope1979
Honest question:
Is Chuck Schumer married to a man?
9:16 PM · Apr 15, 2023
https://twitter.com/CrystalHope1979/status/1647408605635784704/photo/1
By then, [they] already "controlled" China.
10:36 PM · Apr 15, 2023
https://twitter.com/Dog47Sam/status/1647428659651788803
you don't need sauce when it's a know FACT!
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/women-making-beer
The first written beer recipe is considered to be the Hymn to Ninkasi, circa 1800 B.C. Ninkasi was the Sumerian goddess of beer, and the Sumerians were one of the first peoples who left us hard evidence of beer-drinking. Beer predates that recipe, though: Archaeologists have placed the first fermented beverage consumption at roughly 9,000 years ago and the first signs of beer, specifically, about 4,000 years later. Many believe beer propelled the shift from Paleolithic to Neolithic civilization when hunter-gatherers realized they’d have to settle in one place to reliably harvest grain.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/women-making-beer_n_5b914f13e4b0cf7b003d8263
craftbeer.com/craft-beer-muses/evolving-womens-contributions-brewing
https://www.winemag.com/2020/12/22/women-beer-history/
https://www.womenshistory.org/articles/women-and-beer-forgotten-pairing
https://www.mrbeer.com/blog/post/the-history-of-women-in-brewing
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/ny-women-beer-brewers-history-month-men-competition-witches-20210310-7tvwi4662nexffvaumdskkuw6q-story.html
Those words check out on https://translate.google.com/