Anonymous ID: da9479 June 23, 2018, 12:21 a.m. No.1872688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2740 >>2862 >>3281

When Sheila Jackson Lee said that President Trump was going to fire Rosenstein on Friday, Q responded by saying, "What is this? Would she know?" There are two possibilities here. 1.) POTUS intentionally leaked inaccurate stories to catch a leaker or 2.) She is watching the boards. Q normally doesn't tell us plans ahead of time. So why would Q all of a sudden start the negative posts about Rosenstein? What if all of the Q posts about RR in the kill box were meant to mislead the opposition?

 

I think everyone here will agree when I say that the 2016 election of President Trump was the most crucial election in US history. The future of our Republic was at stake. Obviously, there was a plan, years in the making, to prevent Hillary from rigging the election. But, she thought it would be rigged. The second that she lost, it was obvious to everyone in her inner circle, that there were patriots who prevented her from being able to steal it.

 

So, with that said. I don't believe for one second that after winning the most important election in US history, maybe even world history, that President Trump would appoint Rod Rosenstein to be 2nd in charge at the Department of Justice if he is truly corrupt. I think that the anons who consider this can identify the pure genius of Q for posting negative posts about Rosenstein. For example, the time that Q said "Why did Rosenstein [beg] Paul Ryan not to release the memo?" I don't believe that this was a real event. Which is why "beg" was intentionally put into brackets. It was meant to make the leftists believe that Rosenstein was moving against POTUS. Heck, Sarah Carter still tells this story almost once a week. The leftists know down deep that President Trump is innocent, so there only hope of removing him from office is through corrupt measures. The more corrupt that leftists believe Rosenstein to be, the more they will support him.

 

Anons, the stage is set. More than likely, the Republicans will attempt to impeach Rosenstein. Every single leftist will oppose it. This will drive them even more behind him. Now, when Rosenstein finally reveals all of the damning crimes of treason by the Obama administration, the leftists will have to accept every bit of his evidence.

Anonymous ID: da9479 June 23, 2018, 12:38 a.m. No.1872799   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2806

>>1872740

I know, I probably shouldn't be advertising any of this if that's what's really going on right now. But, just in case, I'm not going to jump on the anti-Rosenstein train just yet. The plan was years in the making. I just believe that every single person is right where they're supposed to be. I trust the plan.

Anonymous ID: da9479 June 23, 2018, 12:44 a.m. No.1872831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2842 >>2868 >>2926

>>1872813

>>1872806

 

From my own research from carefully re-reading all crumbs, I 100% believe that Mueller and Rosenstein are both working for President Trump and have been since the very beginning. Everything else is just to make the leftists defend them. I don't think anything we post can really mess up the plan because there are already 35,000 sealed indictments. But, the more time that they have, those numbers get to keep rising.

Anonymous ID: da9479 June 23, 2018, 12:53 a.m. No.1872889   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1872842

>>1872868

 

Exactly. Every leftist worships Mueller. He made his special counsel as blatantly biased as possible so they would support him. All members of his special counsel were more than likely arrested during the very first week and were given plea deals to keep their mouths shut or face gitmo and all of their assets seized from their families. The only power they have on the special counsel is to give up other names and that's it. Sessions recused himself by making up a stupid story about sitting at a dinner table with a Russian. Well, I say stupid, it was actually brilliant because it made leftists believe there was Russian collusion, which by the way isn't even a crime. But, the real reason he made up this story was because his senate confirmation vote was too close. Rosenstein's wasn't close at all. It didn't appear partisan when he appointed Mueller. Had Sessions gotten through with the same vote count as Rosenstein, he would have also appointed Mueller.