California Appeals Court gives mixed rulings in Apple case
The appeals court affirmed a district court ruling that Apple’s anti-steering policy violated California’s Unfair Competition Law.
celebrated the result.
Last March the attorney general filed a brief in support of California’s law. This ruling from the Ninth Circuit acknowledging the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) establishes a fair interpretation of the law.
“Apple’s anti-steering provision violates the UCL’s unfair prong, and entered an injunction prohibiting Apple from enforcing the anti-steering provision against any developer. Apple challenges each aspect on appeal. We affirm,” the ruling said.
“I am pleased that the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the strength of California’s consumer protection law and upheld our state’s important role in enforcing fair competition laws on behalf of consumers. Today’s decision upholding this state law is a win for consumers and a competitive marketplace, “ Bonta said.
The appeals court affirmed a district court ruling that Apple’s anti-steering policy violated California’s Unfair Competition Law because it prevented consumers from making informed purchasing decisions and obtaining lower prices. Although part of the developers’ contract signed by Epic, prohibiting app developers from informing customers about ways to pay for their apps and subscriptions outside of Apple’s App Store was found to be a violation of California’s law.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-appeals-court-gives-mixed-rulings-apple-case