you should put Pig on moon in this picture.
That was Nasa photo of the day and I checked it out it's a real photo, taken in Paris on April 7 and 10:22 PM and I went to Kstars, set the time and location and it all checked out! (it has meta data with the camara specifics.
I figure since Nasa posted it, it must be a fair use thing to use it as you want, if you worry about such things.
Interesting, it was probably taken while there were riots going on in Paris!
it's not Mr. Pig, it's Snarky Cat, but a similar idea.
this was discussed a lot in the early days of Q by anon.
it's one of the tells of shills.
they love to make others feel distress.
they think that it's somehow clever.
they make it about winning and losing.
and they project stuff as if anon are hurt by the feeble demonic behavior.
after 5 years of this we've seen a lot and the shills are usually amateurs.
the bragging and lack of humility and attention whoring is tasteless in a baker.
makes the bread stale out of the oven, moldy before mid bread, and the baker filtered almost immediately.
yup, five years ago Jack was a dolt for a while.
He sure did snap out of it, though, didn't he?
thanks for reminding me of one of my favorite stories of redemption and young men coming of age!
He's a true American Patriot!
if it's stolen it is not a 'win'
I use the baby diaper cream and it really helps reduce the bug bite red dots that happen from time to time.
San Andreas was a person
San means 'Saint'
see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Andreas
"San Andreas is an archaic variation of the Spanish language San Andrés (Saint Andrew, the apostle). "
There is no double meaning with this, anon.
you know your other little French 'san' without is not correct in this case.
stop gaslighting.
Saint Andrew: the brother of Peter.
stealing isn't winning.
Cheaters Never Prosper.
no harm no fowl, anon, I wasn't accusing you of anything.
making up fake etemology for things that are well known, and for such a famous person as Saint Andrew is Gaslighting.
and you keep doing it by arguing that you were correct with 'double meanings'
this new thing seem to be an attention whore who is posting too much all at once, and not really apropos.
attached please see the result of your very very very hard work using whatever tool you have to make these knock off thangs that are too much all at once: what 'your public' sees (after filtering you)
The corrupt in banking (not all are) love it because it means that the people that really shouldn't have mortgages will get them, and then there will be defaults and they will get to foreclose and take all the chips.
it won't really help anyone because the result will be banks owning those houses eventually.
mortgages were a way for banks to own it all without having to pay the property tax.
the effect is that people who would not afford it are now going to be able to get the loan.
will they be able to keep paying it?
it's clearly unfair to the borrowers of higher income or with better credit scores.