TYB
>>18789343
No, it's you.
>>18789351
The funny thing is, is you're not stating a fact, just a blanket generalization designed to muddy the waters. Keeps eyes off you and your ideology though, doesn't it? Besides which, if it was true Anon's would be all over it, but they're not, and it's only shills that seem to push that single-minded blame game for some strange reason.
Bakers can't ban, retard. And racial division spam is not "having a different opinion." Why are you so fucking dumb?
>>18789376
Since when?
>FUCK ETs TOO