>>18837885 lb

>all the "predecessors" are fake invented red herrings.

What of your research led you to believe that?

And why would they make up incriminating information to add to their list of punishable-by-death offenses?

>MK is just "mind control".

You sure?

All evidence points to "MK" meaning "Mark", as in "version".

Mk I, Mk II, Mk III, Mk Naomi, Mk Ultra, Mk Search.

Please explain.

>They are usually not so sloppy.

Who/what are you referring to here?

>Subsequent programs have been far more advanced, and you can bet it all has new names

I would agree with that.

>My take - having studied it for years

Means you've also studied this document extensively, then, right?

https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/media/publications/human_drug_testing_by_the_cia_1977_hearings_before_us_senate.pdf

>>18838461

Knew you were a shill by your original post.

Thanks for confirmation.

You [MK Action].

>>18838461

>>18838528

Evidence is it's a common naming scheme in many industries for many different things.

What's your evidence that says MK means "mind control"?

>Name 1 piece of such "evidence"?

>>18838461

>>18838546

Deductive reasoning and thinking for oneself is a powerful tool.

I didn't get here because I saw everything I needed to see with my physical eyes.

I have another eye that functions very well, and sees many secrets that [you and your puppet masters] try your hardest to keep hidden.

>>18838384

>San Francisco group's poll shows

This sample is taken from the absolute most skewed population in the entire US.

Imagine if this poll were taken with a TRUE distribution across the country.

It would be much morered.

>4-6% lost forever.

Honestly, I hope the numbers are lower than that.