Anonymous ID: ee4a91 May 13, 2023, 8:32 a.m. No.18840650   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0663 >>0696 >>0719 >>0819

What are the odds?

 

The chance of any event lining up directly on the clock is 1 in 60. But anons can draw the line straight across to the other side of the clock. So those odds are actually 1 in 30. And you can likewise now zig-zag to the right or left. This reduces the odds again to about 1 in 20.

 

Year deltas can appear 1 in 6 spokes. There are now enough spokes that the odds of a year delta line up are now around 1 in 90. BUT you can claim "two days early" which makes the chance of a year delta lining up 1 in 30.

 

What are the odds? 1 in 20. Or 1 in 30 for year deltas. Those are pretty decent odds which means any given event has a pretty damn good chance of lining up on the clock.

Anonymous ID: ee4a91 May 13, 2023, 9:45 a.m. No.18840895   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0911 >>1223

>>18840881

Did Q say to make the Q clock base 60 (minutes)? No. Why shouldn't the Q clock be base 12 (dirunal hours) instead? Or a base 360 (seconds)? Or since Q is alledgely military intelligence related, why shouldn't the Q clock be base 24?

 

The truth is, Q never said to create a base 60 clock. Q never said to create a Q clock at all.

Anonymous ID: ee4a91 May 13, 2023, 9:57 a.m. No.18840931   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0938 >>0942 >>0947

>>18840911

If you would have chosen a 12 hour dirunal clock model, the chances of any single event lining up would have been 1 in 2.5 and the clock would be much more effective. Get back to the drawing board and redesign it. You could prove so much more that way.

Anonymous ID: ee4a91 May 13, 2023, 11:07 a.m. No.18841148   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18841118

You have to adjust YOUR premise. It's a man-made idol, or oracle as your call it, invented through either misunderstanding or craft to reinforce what as become a cult-like mysticism. Feel free to create a reality of your own choosing. I'm just trying to shine the light of truth here to prevent others from creating one they will regret by buying into such idols.

Anonymous ID: ee4a91 May 13, 2023, 11:47 a.m. No.18841289   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18841265

Did I call you a poopy head? Why are you calling people who don't agree with the clock poopy heads?

 

Anons do what they want. They don't fall into your box and may or may not use clocks for shit.