Anons I just rememered PDJT dropped his Criminal Conspiracy, RICO & Racketeering lawsuit about a year+ ago and he can refile it now!
I don’t know if PDJT realized the ultimate Durham report would prove everything in his own lawsuit, but all of the charges in his own 100 page lawsuit, reads very much like Durhams elucidated crimes of Criminal conspiracy etc
Durham’s report is the actual DOJ and Special Counsel confirming andproving the RICO and Racketeering case against all the subjects involved including other crimes; and if there was any prosecution by Durham it would have been similar to all the crimes PDJT had in his suit.
This is astoundingly lucky because when PDJT refiles his suit,it cannot be legally challenged as a Conspiracy Theory because it is an official legal report signed off by the the DOJ, SC and US Attorney GeneralMerrick Garland a radical democrat that would never allow it’s release of anything untrue.
So Trump can use the exceptional legal product of the DOJ, and none of the charges in his suit can be challenged that they didn’t happen by courts or opposing lawyers, because Durham specifies the action all people involved took, including Obama & Bidan.I get the feeling that the prosecution of all involved will come via PDJT’s lawsuit. Maybe that he was thanking Durham and not upset, because he knew all along the DOJ would not be able to prosecute all the conspirators.
Anons do you have any feedback? Any Lawfags here to comment?
PDJT’s lawsuit attached. See below did the FBI keep his lawsuit alive by continuing to investigate long into 2019-2020, did they extended the Statute of Limitations? Is there any way Trump can prove that all of the players continued through the end of 2020 with election rigging?
Trump’s $24 Million RICO Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton Nearly Doubles in Size and Seeks to Sidestep Legally Fatal Flaw in Original Paperwork
AARON KELLERJun 22nd, 2022, 10:35 am
The revamped lawsuit seeks to sidestep theapplicable statute of limitations, a legal mechanism which stops lawsuits dead in their tracks if they are filed beyond a certain time. Most, if not all, of defendants in Trump’s lawsuit have asserted statute of limitations defenses as a complete bar to many or all of the claims the ex-president pressed against them.
“The gravamen of [Trump’s] claims concerns alleged events occurring in 2016 and 2017, so the statute of limitations on his claims expired long ago,” Clinton’s own lawyers wrote in an April 20 motion to dismiss the original complaint. That motion cites the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure that governs dismissals based on so-called “time-barred” claims.
https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/trumps-24-million-rico-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-nearly-doubles-in-size-and-seeks-to-sidestep-legally-fatal-flaw-in-original-paperwork/