>>18957621

>We don't "volunteer for enlistment" under blue helmets.

Court-Martial Goes Easy On Army Medic New Convicted Of Disobedience, Discharged For Refusing U.N. Insignia, Command

Thu., Jan. 25, 1996

A U.S. soldier who refused to serve under U.N. command was convicted of disobedience Wednesday and given a bad-conduct discharge.

Spc. Michael New, 22, is the first American serviceman court-martialed for refusing to accept foreign command on a United Nations operation.

The jury could have slapped New with a dishonorable discharge, six months’ incarceration and a loss of pay. New’s attorney said he thinks the less-severe sentence indicates the jury believed New’s concerns were legitimate.

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1996/jan/25/court-martial-goes-easy-on-army-medic-new/

>>18957942

>wonder what happened when the SEALs found out there was no bin Ladin?

Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?

Why not MI?

If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?

Why wouldn’t we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?

Q154

>>18957984

>Who is holding the military back from taking back our country?

By 'military' do you mean the seven who are in on the full picture?

"You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands.

Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military.

Why is this relevant?"

Think in terms of strategy, Anon, not tactics. What would their mission be? Scorched earth and combat in America? Suppose their mission was to accomplish the dismantling of control mechanisms across the political, social and military spectrum while minimizing the impact on the population and at the same time awakening the population to the existence of the control mechanisms? They've been taking it back - quite visibly - since 2016.

>>18958176

Understood and agreed, Anon. At the time some SPECOPS were under CIA control. (That ended under POTUS Trump). Q's point was the military was not tasked to get Bin Laden, rather the CIA was. Why? The CIA controlled our operators at the time but the mission they were assigned was apparently to liquidate the target. Why? Q asks why not capture and interrogate the target. Was UBL CIA? is the implied question.

>>18958222

>Was a MAGA mega donor.

Negative. The ownership of the aircraft was a MAGA mega donor family through a corporation they owned. The pilot has not, to anon's knowledge been identified yet.

>>18958233

>>this plane crash is starting to look like bunker apple yellow sky shit

>flight over DC would send biden to bunker

>fly by the big apple

>yellow?

>jet intercept in the sky

Anons learned the answer when we were informed of the death of Mike Green, Anon. 'Bunker …' etc. was resolved at that time:

"What stringer was provided (2) days prior to event?

Conf_D-TT^_v891_0600_yes

_green1_0600

BUNKER APPLE Yellow Sky [… + 1]

confirm 0600 (time) yes

Green 0600 (time)

Base Green Yellow (condition yellow?) Air

What were the keywords in the stringer?

confirm

green

Yellow

Sky"

It's all there:

https://qalerts.app/?q=bunker+apple