>>18996110 lb/pb

>Executive Order 13526 Sec 1.7 "Classification Prohibitions and Limitations

Yes, it will be interesting to see how this plays out. Been wondering if the Iran Deal is in some of those boxes. Hillary's SAPs, maybe. [They] would have to choose between disclosure or risk dismissal of the indictment see '(2)' below:

18a U.S. Code § 6 - Procedure for cases involving classified information

(e)Prohibition on Disclosure of Classified Information by Defendant, Relief for Defendant When United States Opposes Disclosure.—

(2)Whenever a defendant is prevented by an order under paragraph (1) from disclosing or causing the disclosure of classified information, the court shall dismiss the indictment or information; except that, when the court determines that the interests of justice would not be served by dismissal of the indictment or information, the court shall order such other action, in lieu of dismissing the indictment or information, as the court determines is appropriate. Such action may include, but need not be limited to—

(A)dismissing specified counts of the indictment or information;

(B)finding against the United States on any issue as to which the excluded classified information relates; or

(C)striking or precluding all or part of the testimony of a witness.

18a U.S. Code Compiled Act 96-456 - CLASSIFIED INFORMATION PROCEDURES ACT

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18a/compiledact-96-456

>>18996270

She is likely one of the nineteen. Maybe someone pinged her interface. Another shot fired in an invisible war.

[19] would cease to exist immediately upon the harm of select individuals.

Think nuclear stand-off.

Clarified?

Q

>>18996410

>We need to take back the word

>>18996661

>These charges are straddling the trapeze wires of some other artist

It's actually a scripted made-for-tv drama intended to draw the world's attention. Kayfabe. The plot is about disclosure of information, both to Americans and to the world. Expect a flood of information on many fronts. It may have started tonight. It will be like [Their] MSM is facing a firehose. That's the strategy.

https://qalerts.net/?q=flood

>>18996719

>>18996710

>>18996729

>DOJ changed definition

18a U.S. Code § 1 - Definitions

(a)“Classified information”, as used in this Act, means any information or material that has been determined by the United States Government pursuant to an Executive order, statute, or regulation, to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national security and any restricted data, as defined in paragraph r. of section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(y)).

(b)“National security”, as used in this Act, means the national defense and foreign relations of the United States.

42 U.S.C. 2014(y)

(y)The term “Restricted Data” means all data concerning (1) design, manufacture, or utilization of atomic weapons; (2) the production of special nuclear material; or (3) the use of special nuclear material in the production of energy, but shall not include data declassified or removed from the Restricted Data category pursuant to section 2162 of this title.

18a U.S. Code § 6 - Procedure for cases involving classified information

(1)Before any hearing is conducted pursuant to a request by the United States under subsection (a), the United States shall provide the defendant with notice of the classified information that is at issue. Such notice shall identify the specific classified information at issue whenever that information previously has been made available to the defendant by the United States. When the United States has not previously made the information available to the defendant in connection with the case, the information may be described by generic category, in such forms as the court may approve, rather than by identification of the specific information of concern to the United States.

(2)Whenever the United States requests a hearing under subsection (a), the court, upon request of the defendant, may order the United States to provide the defendant, prior to trial, such details as to the portion of the indictment or information at issue in the hearing as are needed to give the defendant fair notice to prepare for the hearing.

>>18996767

>It’s pretty clear there’s a real possibility they did nothing because they thought it would hurt Mrs. Clinton during the election.

This statement is intended to influence the readers/listeners into regarding their unknown motivations as political. Laura, you should ask them who they work for. Who bribed or blackmailed them. Ask who their controllers are. Ask when and how they were compromised.

>>18996799

>name fag and wanna be retard,

Think of the junior ranks, Anon. Some poor intelligence specialist has had to pull duty on this board Since 2017. The only way his unit has to offer encouragement to the anons is to post cat pics. You 'thank' them by calling them names?