Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 8:20 p.m. No.19074395   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4407 >>4455 >>4608 >>4959 >>5034

>>19074339

>Retired CIA Spook Blames Biden's Push To 'Diversify The Agency By Pushing Out Seasoned Hands' For The Prigozhin Debacle

Anons are good at spotting patterns. 50-year-old white guys need not apply:

Titanic tour CEO Stockton Rush said he didn't hire '50-year-old white guys' because they were NOT 'inspirational'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12219265/Stockton-Rush-said-didnt-hire-50-year-old-white-guys-NOT-inspirational.html

Stockton Rush, Pilot of the Titan Submersible, Dies at 61

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/22/us/stockton-rush-dead.html

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 8:41 p.m. No.19074476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4479 >>4608 >>4959 >>5034

>>19074452

>Nuclear-Powered Nuclear-Armed Autonomous Torpedo

New technologies always create questions about capabilities, tactical employment, and countermeasures, but rarely has one created so many simultaneously as has Russia’s Kanyon nuclear torpedo (also called Poseidon or Status-6). While the Soviet Union maintained a nuclear arsenal that included torpedoes carrying nuclear warheads (as did the United States for a time), the Russian Navy has spent years developing a new conceptual approach to these devices. By pairing nuclear warheads with emerging automation, Russia is moving swiftly toward creating an autonomous nuclear deterrent and turning longstanding views of submarine-based nuclear weapons on their heads.

 

Caption: The Poseidon intercontinental nuclear-powered nuclear-armed autonomous torpedo:

2M39 Poseidon/Status-6 (Ctatyc-6)/Skif (CKM8) seabed launched variant. NATO reporting name: Kanyon. This graphic from analyst H. I. Sutton shows the weapon to scale next to a person (for scale), along with a developmental version, a surrogate load for testing, and a Russian Harpsichord unmanned underwater vehicle. Credit: H. I. Sutton / Covert Shores. Used by permission.

 

Kanyon breaks all the traditional nuclear deterrence and classification rules. It is a nuclear-powered weapon, therefore possessing theoretically unlimited range. It has the potential to be both a strategic and tactical nuclear weapon and does not fall within the weapon definitions of the New START treaty. Its current launch platform has been converted into a submarine that cannot easily be classified within standard submarine categories. And, perhaps most frightening, this nuclear weapon has the potential for autonomous operation.

Autonomous Nuclear Torpedoes Usher in a Dangerous Future

U.S. Naval Institute: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/may/autonomous-nuclear-torpedoes-usher-dangerous-future

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 8:49 p.m. No.19074517   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4543

>>19074463

Why would an intelligence operation reveal a deadline or date for an operation to begin? There is a logical reason. That reason is to deceive the target of the operation. It is a principle of military deception, Anon.

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 9:07 p.m. No.19074587   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074566

>And that explains NATO’s panic.

Russia’s New ‘Poseidon’ Super-Weapon: What You Need To Know

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/03/russias-new-poseidon-super-weapon-what-you-need-to-know/

 

Evading US Multi-Layered Defense System, Russia To Induct Its Nuclear Armed, Nuclear Powered Autonomous Torpedo In 2023

https://eurasiantimes.com/new-sia-to-induct-its-nuclear-armed-nuclear-powered-autonomou/

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 9:15 p.m. No.19074614   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074603

>said one analyst, "They were supposed to be marching on Moscow but instead they were ordering Daiquiris."

The choice of drink by the analyst reveals the analyst doesn't understand the cohort under analysis. 'Ordering Daiquiris' is something this analyst does on personal down time.

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 9:29 p.m. No.19074672   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074609

>“He should be very careful around open windows in his new surroundings, in Belarus, where he's going,”

General, Sir, you've inspired an anon at /qresearch to share with you a favorite Q post directed @Jack:

Don't drop the soap.

Q

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 9:52 p.m. No.19074754   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074730

>1917

>That year sure has been mentioned an awful lot…

Stupid media completely missed the reference. Everyone (but the media) knows what happened in Red October 1917:

 

History According to Trump: The President and the 1917 Pandemic That Wasn’t

The U.S. leader, famously illiterate about history, eagerly promotes his place in it.

 

“You could probably go back to 1917, where it was a terrible period of time,” he added. “You all know what happened in 1917.” On Tuesday, he returned once again to the theme of his once-in-a-century bad luck. “Even if you go back into 1917,” Trump said at a White House event for small-business leaders, “that was the worst of all time, but it was also not as bad as here. It was very bad, it was very rough. It was a bad one, but it wasn’t quite like what we’re going through right now.”

 

A search of the White House Web site found that Trump mentioned 1917 on twenty-three days since mid-March. In a handful of instances—six, by my count—Trump referred to both 1917 and 1918, suggesting that someone had perhaps tried to give him the correct date, but he could never quite get it to stick.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/trump-and-the-1917-pandemic-that-wasnt

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 10:10 p.m. No.19074819   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4830 >>4896 >>4978

>>19074802

>He's the definition of hubris.

He joined the Bud Holland club. Too bad he took innocents with him.

https://theaviationgeekclub.com/the-story-of-bud-holland-the-rogue-pilot-that-crashed-his-b-52-after-having-maneuvered-it-beyond-its-operational-limits-at-low-altitude/

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 10:32 p.m. No.19074874   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074839

>All adults under 65 should be screened for anxiety, health panel says

This makes me think the poisoning operation that induces anxiety began in 1958 or so.

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 10:50 p.m. No.19074935   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4941

>>19074879

>They think their Wagner op will take down Putin?

[They] were hoping so but were outwitted. Everything was planned - the media coverage was part of [their] operation to buy off Wagner in a rent-a-coup. Recent media coverage exposes [their] assets. Playbook known.

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 11:02 p.m. No.19074966   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074896

>reckless flying by one of the pilots

"Holland had dead-ended his career as chief of stan/eval, not an uncommon occurrence, but had a troublesome penchant for flying beyond regulation limits, either flying too low, too fast, or on the edge of the plane’s, capability. Worse, he got away with repeated aerial outrages that should have permanently grounded him on several counts. His shenanigans proved doubly egregious since his position demanded he set the standards for other wing pilots. Yet none of his commanders took the imperative step of grounding him for cause, a drastic but necessary step in this case. Holland had only months left until retirement, and successive commanders hoped he would behave himself until that time."

"Apparently Holland fancied himself the best B-52 pilot who ever lived and took pride in displaying his prowess in inappropriate, irresponsible ways. Or maybe he skirted the limits in retaliation of not being promoted; I don’t know. At a previous air show practice, he had blasted over the field and the crowd at much too high an airspeed and then overbanked the aircraft during his pull-up, against the agreed parameters for the maneuver."

https://theaviationgeekclub.com/the-story-of-bud-holland-the-rogue-pilot-that-crashed-his-b-52-after-having-maneuvered-it-beyond-its-operational-limits-at-low-altitude/

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 11:10 p.m. No.19074995   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5023

>>19074903

Perhaps people born after 1958 should be screened because that is when the poisoning started. Perhaps all Americans were targeted beginning that year.

 

PHARMA [CLAS-D]

WATER

AIR

CHEMICALS PUSHED FOR HOME USE CLEANING [CANCER][BABY ON FLOOR-HANDS IN MOUTH - THE START].

ULTIMATE WIN [DEATH + MONEY].

THE FED.

ROTHSCHILD.

'CONSPIRACY'

'CONSPIRACY'

'CONSPIRACY'

Q

1010

Anonymous ID: e15974 June 25, 2023, 11:15 p.m. No.19075015   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19074932

CHURCHILL'S description of the Royal Navy is included in the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations as having appeared in the book, Former Navy Person, by Sir Peter Gretton. The Oxford Dictionary suggests that Churchill's phrase should be compared with naval phrases dating from the 19th century - 'Rum, bum and bacca' and 'Ashore, it's wine, women and song, aboard it's rum, bum and concertina'.

It looks as though here, as elsewhere, Churchill took an earlier quotation and improved upon it. In The Irrepressible Churchill, compiled by Kay Halle (Robson Books, 1985), Churchill is said to have used the phrase in 1913, when he was First Lord of the Admiralty. According to 'an ear-witness', he was having trouble with some of his admirals at a strategy meeting. One of them accused him of having impugned the traditions of the Royal Navy, provoking the reply: 'And what are they? They are rum, sodomy and the lash'. https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,,-1433,00.html