Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 5:08 a.m. No.19126689   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6698 >>6764 >>6771

>>19126476

> 368885

>>19126490

the id 368885 is someone who is doing a mock extremeist Q fan personality.

this is the same kind like the personas on social media that get banned.

they show up out of no where and do parady personas and they mock and make the 'supporters' of some supposed cause look like idiots or extremists.

 

it screams and hollars and insults and defames.

Slander is it's weapon of choice.

it pretends that it is on 'our' side.

basic point: do not fall for such idiocy.

38 posts in a 300 post bread is not organic

over produced crap memes of a defamatory variety are not produced by anon but by teams.

 

watch it now flip out on me and call me derogatory names

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 5:15 a.m. No.19126702   🗄️.is 🔗kun

interesting that I didn't post to that other one but it responds.

the teams always use some other persona to do the attack.

so that's two ids on that team so far.

you poke it to get a response and reveal it's 'frens' in the bread.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 5:43 a.m. No.19126799   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6964

>>19126771

>>19126771

I poke at it to find out who it is and why it is here is because it's so obviously not a Q person, but just someone who recently showed up and pretends to be one.

 

it was the use of the term "our esteemed leader Q" that gave it away that it's not a person who follows Q.

it's someone here trying to be the voice of a movement.

 

no, it's not a threat. but it does reveal it's megalomaniac point of view by saying that I'd think it is.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 5:54 a.m. No.19126829   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19126792

before the Pilgrims ever showed up there was a major war that went on between two groups.

the history of all of that is supressed

there were cities that disappeared.

the 'native lands' and the 'this is our land' thing was a thing but there was plenty of land that wasn't inhabited, and lots of people who claimed land that they had no use for.

 

many of the natives were eager to trade for stuff, technology, knowledge, beads.

there were honest people and dishonest people. There were holy people and unholy people.

it had nothing to do with what tribe they were from.

it had everything to do with who they were.

three, four, five hundred years later all of that is buried in the past.

the marxists showed up in the US and saw the 'indiginious' and decided 'here is a wedge we can use, let's marry into those groups, take them over, and turn them against the government.

they used their 'my people/your people' narratives of division.

 

in fact in many place the sucessful and unsucessful were all already integreated. many people had both European and so-called indiginious ancestors.

 

and also in many places when the Europeans showed up the locals were very happy to finally become part of the modern world. For example in the North West (Washington State, Vancouver)

 

the bogus 'proud natives' narrative was a creation of marxism to use as a wedge.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 6 a.m. No.19126848   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6884 >>6915

>>19126830

perhaps it had 751 posts and then the censors went in and deleted all the posts by personas that they disapprove of. If it had the persona they call 'vatican shill' or one of the ones that posts stuff about Israel, they'd delete by ID and that might be a lot of posts. did you check the board log?

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 6:26 a.m. No.19126923   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19126884

since at least January/ February

anyone who spams the same trite nonsense over and over is considered to be a candidate for their posts being deleted.

some of the BV are far more censorious than others.

at some point anyone who discussed that ethnic group that demands censorship for anyone that isn't one of them posting about them, even if in support, that topic would guarantee for a while that it be all deleted. So even if you said 'I don't like what you said about that most-coddled ethnicity' you'd get deleted.

 

I think that VS was a creation to say 'see , we don't just delete those who defame the most-coddle-ethnicity, we also delete people who make up stuff about Catholics too.

 

but who knows. It's all written with the same hateful tone, and the same kind of fake history that ignores most of the major events of the past.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 6:40 a.m. No.19126981   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7011

>>19126915

show me in the board log. I'm seeing just two that were 'banned' for other than CP and the reason was 'bot spam'

attached is an image of the board log taken within the last five minutes.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 6:46 a.m. No.19127012   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7028

>>19126994

I do critique the board volunteers from time to time, and I've seen some stuff but

it's been a long time.

I think that one made up what he said.

and lately banning by IP seems to be not used anymore except for CP.

 

three years ago, when the board was overrun by that shill team, it took about a year. and then who was it ? OSS? who banned everyone.

the board was just a place for his frens.

finally that ended and the bans were lifted.

all I've seen lately is a bv will delete psts and the poster just keeps on going.

and usually it was when someone started talking about the XXXX, who demand that no one discuss them. (not all of them demand that, but the ones who are moderators and work for XXXXXX do)

and that is a topic that if you discuss it your posts will be deleted. but being banned for it?

I don't think that is happening.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 6:49 a.m. No.19127024   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19127011

all I've seen Dart do is delete posts.

and if you don't talk about that subject that we aren't allowed to talk about it seems as though he's blind to it.

He's a partisan for them, obviusly. But he usually is doing what a reasonable one of them will do, and not going after anyone and everyone, but just being a XXXX like they will be when they do their ethno-dominate bit that so many of them are prone to do.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 6:58 a.m. No.19127062   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7067

>>19127045

wrong

Q was directing a post at Adam Schiff and showing his adorable son and loving family and saying 'look how you let your kid wear that shirt'.

wht the poster who posts the picture that Q posts is doing is implying that all are bad and saying stuff that implies that, for example, the as if religious rites of passage are not good.

 

Q saying 'Adam, you're being a bad dad, you're pointing your son to be a spy' verses the poster 'all . . . . are bad' which is an obvious statement of slander.

 

It's not Adams adorable boy who is the issue, it's Adam's family being partisans and filling the boy up with division and letting him wear a clown shirt.

Anonymous ID: 714c82 July 5, 2023, 7:09 a.m. No.19127116   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19127067

he stood and clapped when President Trump said that we want to elliminate AIDS so . . . he's got something in him that's good.

all the rest of the Dems just sat there.

 

people go rotton.

he certainly let himself rot, and dabbles in slander.

was he always rotten?

probably once he was a youth who thought he was doing good for the world.