Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 12:03 p.m. No.19258048   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8067

>>19258032

 

"If you love only those who love you, what credit is it to you? Do not even the pagans do that?"

 

โ€œWoe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in peopleโ€™s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to."

 

Why do you try to make God out as hateful and unforgiving? Why do you worship a God who you believe would torture someone for eternity?

 

Again, the gates of hell will not prevail.

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 12:40 p.m. No.19258196   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8198 >>8204 >>8236

>Do anons have even a single piece of evidence that adrenochrome is harvested from children and consumed by the โ€œeliteโ€?

 

>>19258182

>It literally has it's own Wikipedia.

 

That literally does not say anything about it being harvested and consumed let alone gives a source for that claim.

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 12:53 p.m. No.19258246   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Other anon >Do anons have even a single piece of evidence that adrenochrome is harvested from children and consumed by the โ€œeliteโ€?

 

Retarded Anon >It literally has it's own Wikipedia.

 

Also retarded anon >yOu SAid FaKe

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 12:59 p.m. No.19258267   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8285

>>19258248

 

I never said they are, the fact of the matter is the question was for evidence, and wikipedia which doesn't even make the claim was provided as such.

 

You seem weirdly concerned with someone pointing out that what is presented as evidence is not evidence, almost like you have a narrative to push.

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 1:06 p.m. No.19258297   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8351

>>19258276

 

Correct. Q has mentioned children being kidnapped, tortured, raped and sacrificed in the name of pure evil.

 

Q has not said anything, or been connected in any way, to the claim of people harvesting and consuming adrenochrome.

 

Take a truth add lies > discredit the truth.

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 1:20 p.m. No.19258342   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8349

>>19258325

 

I never said it would be.

 

I've never made a claim of it being real or not, I simply pointed out that supposed evidence cited is not evidence, and that Q can not be connected to claims about adrenochrome, only anons. Some here can't seem to handle that.

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 1:24 p.m. No.19258363   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8407

>>19258333

 

Sauce your claim of LdR talking about it.

 

I'm not arguing one way or the other if it happens, I'm arguing that we have absolutely no proof, nor anything even connecting Q to claims about adrenochrome.

 

>There is 'Q'. 1

 

>There are 'Anons'. 2

 

>There is no 'Qanon'. 3

 

>Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.

Anonymous ID: 1ef8f0 July 28, 2023, 1:31 p.m. No.19258396   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8409 >>8421

>>19258349

 

You asked me "so where WOULD this information get published?" in reply to my and another anon talking about evidence. You mentioned the recipe book later, that's not what I was responding to.

 

I'm not coming unglued at all, follow the conversation with the tags.