How? Kamala is completely unlikeable. She'd never win a term on her own, much less two.
Yeah. It's all a part of the plan. Google Operation:Trust.
Um, pointing out that a criminal is Jewish isn't "propaganda" no matter how you try to pilpul it. It's no different than pointing out that a criminal is White, Asian, Black, Middle Eastern, Native American, et al.
I know the concept is hard for you to understand.
How exactly is pointing out that a specific criminal is Jewish, "shilling?" Are you saying that there are no Jewish criminals?
Or are you saying you're not allowed to TALK about Jewish criminals.
Maybe we should Occam's Razor this, no?
Uh, excuse me? You do not "see" anything, Anon. If you did, you wouldn't have tried to silence me using Jewish buzzwords.
We've already established that Dan Goldman has been shorting stocks and insider trading since he was elected into Congress, even though the dude is a gorillionaire heir to Levi-Strauss. It's well known. We've also know that he was lead prosecutor on Trump's first impeachment trial and was "counselor" to Ratskin on the second one. We've also learned that muh "Russia Russia Russia" (tm) was utter bullshit. Goldman, as a Federal Prosecutor had access to ALL the same docs and evidence that was exposed as fraudulent the past two years, but he still did the impeachment trial. Now, he's running cover for the most corrupt President in American history, due to a gaffe Goldman, himself, made during Committee Hearings.
So how exactly is pointing out that he just happens to be Jewish have ANYTHING to do with the Holocaust or muh "anti-Semitisms" (tm)?
I'll give you a hint: it doesn't.
If that's the case, then how come everyone wants to talk about muh "White Supremacists" (tm) whenever there's muh "mass shooter" (tm) even though from FBI statistics, the majority of mass shooters are Black?
Race and religion are irrelevant, no?
Also, Anon how exactly do you know that "Satanists have been using Jews as frontmen for a long, long time" and not the other way around? Anton LaVey was born a Jew, but became a Satanist. Keep in mind, Anon is merely making observations.
Observations, it seems people, especially BO/BV, don't want to allow.
Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
Kek! Riiiiiiiiight.
Do the ADL next.
https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/its-okay-be-white
>Because their logic is negation praxis of reality, in order to change reality into one where their power 'over' 'the other' appears to increase.
Like crying muh "anti-Semitisms" (tm) whenever anyone says any mean, hurty words about the "Chosen Ones?" (tm)
>Q did write that the new world order are Satanists, and Jesus called out the blasphemy of Satanists who called themselves Jews but were not.
>Q never slandered Jewishness.
Except Christianity was born of Judaism, as was Islam, no? (Allegedly) Anon is not Christian. Anon is Buddhist. Anon was raised a Catholic and saw the evil of the church first hand. As for Jesus naming the "Satanists" (tm), sure they all died thousands of years ago and there's nothing left, but the "good ones" who conveniently seem to run cover for the "bad ones" that we know still exists, by screaming "ANTI-SEMITE" and "but the HOLOCAUST" as soon as a person points out that the "bad one" just so happens to be a Jew.
>Obama was born into a Muslim family, and became a Satanist.
Bush was born into a Methodist family (don't quote anon on the specific denomination) and became a Satanist.
Karl Marx was born into a Jewish family and he wrote poems praising Satan.
We can at least all agree, and when I say all agree this includes the Satanists, every human being is born in the image of God.
The Satanists harm children precisely because they accept the 'narrative' that children are closest to God, and they believe they can defeat and destroy God by destroying as many children as possible.
No, the Satanists rape, torture and murder children, because they CHOOSE to. Let's take the BS religious dogma out of it, please. As I pointed out above, I'm NOT Christian, but evil is evil. It doesn't need some bullshit religious label. Anon could give two shits about your religious beliefs. Those are yours. Anon, however, is a father of 3 wonderful boys and I'll gladly throw them in the woodchipper, since it seems you don't appear to have the stomach for it.
>Not true. BO/BV pattern shows they can and do distinguish between nefarious malicious postings meant to divide the world, from honest sincere postings meant to inform the world.
VERY true. The board had moar free speech when muh "Nazis" (tm) were in charge. Funny how Q also mentioned Hitler being a puppet, but I digress. Let's just agree to disagree, Anon, and move on.
Indeed, Anon. One does wonder. Of course, since Putin himself said the NWO worships Satan, as referenced by Q, makes you wonder which side the Baker is on, doesn't it?
I don't remove any source of info. No matter how "bizarre" it appears to be. Sadly, it seems even Anons can't think for themselves.
Kek. You mean like every "Nazi" represents every White person on Earth? Ah hyuk hyuk.
I have an idea. Ignore Loomer, though. I wouldn't want everyone to call me muh "Nazi" (tm).
And apparently Anons are incapable of detecting sarcasm as well.
I should go back to lurkfagging. I didn't realize how many morans are actually on Research.
Comment wasn't directed at you, specifically, Anon. Just making that clear.
>well………..if you'll know how many retards are on this planet, I bet that you'll lurk for a rope.
Um, could you repeat that in English, Anon?
Kek. Anon isn't the one that has a problem with it, it appears. Anon just doesn't like dealing with stupid.