>>19314571
>>19314571
What about this post is the cause for deleting and censoring it? Why is there an agenda to protect these namefags? I'm guessing this will just be met with utter silence as usual.
>Sam
>be yourself
On an anonymous board? Why should we be forced to accept namefags here again? I must have missed that part when the Overton window shifted.
I thought only pussies and fags filtered? I've never filtered in the 6 years I've been here. why should I be told to filter them, yet any opposition of them gets deleted? Namefags are protected. Anonymous anons get the boot for questioning them.