dChan
Anonymous ID: f9b7de Aug. 10, 2023, 5:04 a.m. No.19333367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3368 >>3376 >>3432 >>3553

PART 1 OF 3

 

Allegations of a deadly ongoing RICO scheme (including a criminal cover-up) by Massachusetts judicial officials against Massachusetts citizens made in a successful Motion filed in the Massachusetts Appeals Court that is, itself, allegedly involved in the criminal RICO scheme that is allegedly killing Massachusetts citizens

 

A motion containing multiple allegations of ongoing criminal conduct by Massachusetts judicial officials in the (1) Trial Court, (2) Appeals Court; and (3) Supreme Judicial Court was filed by a Massachusetts citizen in the Massachusetts Appeals Court on Friday, August 4, 2023 (TINY URL FORWARD SLASH20230804OultonMAC) and was subsequently ALLOWED by the Massachusetts Appeals Court on August 9, 2023.

 

Documents filed in support of the Motion included allegations of acts of deadly criminal misconduct and an ongoing alleged cover-up of those alleged crimes by Massachusetts judicial officials.The allowance of the Motion is significant because, in the Motion, the Appellant (Sarah A. Oulton of Agawam, MA) made multiple substantiated allegations of almost unbelievable acts of (1) prior deadly acts against Ms. Oulton’s late parents (one of whom was a U.S. Army veteran, and both of whom were U.S. Air Force civilian retirees); and (2) allegedly ongoing criminal judicial misconduct by Massachusetts judicial officials related to an ongoing alleged criminal cover-up of the alleged crimes against the Oultons in the: (a) Massachusetts Trial Court (i.e., Probate and Family Court Department and the Superior Court Department); (b) Massachusetts Appeals Court, itself (i.e., in the court in which Ms. Oulton’s Motion was filed to be decided by that very court); and (c) Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

 

[to be continued. . . ]

Anonymous ID: f9b7de Aug. 10, 2023, 5:04 a.m. No.19333368   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3376 >>3553 >>3625

>>19333367

PART 2 OF 3

 

The Motion addressed an alleged ongoing Massachusetts Bar Admissions Scandal (with national implications) through which the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court is alleged to have been stealing many millions of taxpayer dollars.Included in Ms. Oulton’s Memorandum of Law and Affidavit were scathing allegations related to the Supreme Judicial Court's alleged decades-long and allegedly ongoing violations of not only certain laws that are specific to Ms. Oulton’s case, but also the three state statutes governing Massachusetts Bar Admissions (G. L. c. 221, secs. 35, 36, and 37), together with unprecedented allegations that, through those Bar Admissions-related alleged acts of egregious judicial misconduct since at least 1990 (according to Ms. Oulton’s colleagues' and her research), the Supreme Judicial Court has allegedly stolen (and allegedly continues to steal) many millions of taxpayer dollars in support of the allegedly non-existent Massachusetts Board of Bar Examiners from the Massachusetts and United States taxpayers.

 

The Motion also embedded a video depicting Ms. Oulton’s October 29, 2021, testimony about these allegations of criminal conduct by Massachusetts judicial officials (including those at the Massachusetts Appeals Court), made to the Massachusetts Legislature’s Joint Committee on the Judiciary, after which Ms. Oulton and others filed Emergency Petitions asking the Massachusetts Legislature to remove all of the judges allegedly involved in the alleged criminal cover-up from the Massachusetts Judicial Branch.

 

Apparently no action on those Emergency Petitions seeking the removal of judges was taken, by the Massachusetts Legislature or Governor (who was served the testimony), at any time so far, therefore it seems that the Massachusetts Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches intentionally have established a gruesome but unconstitutional new system of government that allows state government officials to falsely imprison Massachusetts citizens at nursing homes that have illicit business relationships with Massachusetts judicial officials, steal all personal and real property from those citizens, kill the falsely imprisoned citizens, and then steal the remaining personal and real property from the dead victims’ estates without any criminal or civil consequences whatsoever.

 

Moreover, by allegedly willfully and knowingly violating the three Massachusetts statutes governing Massachusetts Bar Admissions, it seems that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has willfully and knowingly established a system through which certain law school graduates can be arbitrarily and capriciously excluded from the Massachusetts Bar so that they do not have the ability, as licensed attorneys, to challenge the apparently deadly system now in place.

 

[to be continued. . . ]

Anonymous ID: f9b7de Aug. 10, 2023, 5:06 a.m. No.19333376   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3553

>>19333367

>>19333368

 

PART 3 OF 3

 

Ms. Oulton’s unbelievable allegations of ongoing criminal conduct by Massachusetts judicial officials were not challenged, admonished, or sanctioned by the Massachusetts Appeals Court.Interestingly, the Massachusetts Appeals Court made no mention of Ms. Oulton’s allegations of deadly judicial misconduct or of the alleged ongoing criminal cover-up that was allegedly facilitated by the Massachusetts Appeals Court, itself, when the Massachusetts Appeals Court allowed the Motion on August 9, 2023. This is likely because all allegations were substantiated with documentation referenced in the Motion.

 

The Massachusetts Appeals Court’s silence on the allegations speaks volumes. In Friday's motion (TINY URL FORWARD SLASH20230804OultonMAC) Ms. Oulton addressed her allegations of Massachusetts judicial officials’ misconduct so bluntly and directly that Ms. Oulton would have been crazy to do such a thing, if the allegations that Ms. Oulton made were false. But importantly, all of Ms. Oulton’s allegations are true, so the Massachusetts Appeals Court apparently chose not to address them at all. Although the surprising allegations were presented credibly, with documents substantiating them, and although they were presented in a way that seemed as courteous and professional as possible, under the circumstances, the Massachusetts Appeals Court would have been proper to blast Ms. Oulton, if the allegations were false.

 

But no such scolding or sanctioning occurred. Rather than admonish Ms. Oulton or punish her, in any way, for making such disturbing and unprecedented allegations, the Massachusetts Appeals Court simply:

 

(1) allowed the necessary extension of a filing deadline that Ms. Oulton requested for the reasons that Ms. Oulton presented in the Motion; and

 

(2) remained completely silent about Ms. Oulton’s allegations of ongoing criminal conduct by Massachusetts judicial officials in the (1) Trial Court, (2) Appeals Court; and (3) Supreme Judicial Court made in the winning Motion filed in the Massachusetts Appeals Court.

 

This was, apparently, because the disturbing criminal RICO scheme that Ms. Oulton described in the Motion was very well-documented and thus, obviously true. It seems that remaining silent is likely the best course of action for the Massachusetts Appeals Court to take at this time, given that the Emergency Petitions seeking the removal of the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court and other Appeals Court judges are still pending, at this time, and given that the Motion informed that court of currently ongoing and future investigations by officials working far outside of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

 

[THE END]