>>19339355
I think that whoever 'took over' the board quickly realized that anon aren't going away.
bringing back the traniebaker seems a desparate ploy, and they didn't even play the character to be the monster that it had been in the plays that they ran here every overnight during the Winter (of this year).
anon have always known that many bakers are only here to disrupt.
and when the board becomes 100% havoc and name-calling, anon will still post news and report things that they know about.
it just happens a lot less frequently.
4 years ago the way to deal with spam was to have a lot of breads.
now what they do is take the energy that used to be used to make breads (which would be one every 2 to three hours 4 years ago) and delete posts about the > > >, any posts at all about them.
so what would be better? a board with no information (most of it bogus) about the > > > , or a lot more breads, most of the content of which would be hateful and slanderous stuff about the > > > >?