Anonymous ID: 60a37b Aug. 16, 2023, 6:39 a.m. No.19368690   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19368625

>Sup smoking pepe, another day at the office?

Always. Another day of mimicry and defacement for you? Are you winning? Does it feel like winning? What have you taken down other than yourself? Because you never took down me. Deface all the images you want, your narrative has been broken. The cracks are propagating on their own now. Soon it will shatter completely. I just need to continue the push. Are you ready?

Anonymous ID: 60a37b Aug. 16, 2023, 7:08 a.m. No.19368803   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8814

>>19368784

You're not presenting an opposing view to be debated though. Maliciously designed psyop spam to drown out any other voices is not "just having a debate." You lose. Better luck next time. If you're so desperate to post MuhJoo, go to 8kun.top/hivemind. That board was specifically created to post that specific topic. It's been abandoned because no normie or person with even half a brian goes there, but maybe you can revive it because you have the truth, right. Post the truth and they will come. So, just for the day, go do an experiment there to see what kind of participation your "truth," opposing at you claim it to be, receives, and then reconcile that with how it's spammed here. Fucktard.

Anonymous ID: 60a37b Aug. 16, 2023, 7:18 a.m. No.19368858   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8871

>>19368827

> whatโ€™s โ€œabuseโ€ you fucking echo chamber shill idiot

Because MuhJoo spam is rejected you label this board an echo chamber? Do you think that'll work, shill? It worked for so long elsewhere, didn't it? You could control and mold and guide them to chase their tails. You just can't wrap your head around the fact your narrative is useless here.

Anonymous ID: 60a37b Aug. 16, 2023, 7:22 a.m. No.19368876   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

They treat the concept of free speech as if it doesn't protect your rights from the government, but is merely a free-for-all to yell "FIRE!" in a crowded movie theater as much as you want. Isn't 8kun privately owned? What was their go-to response on the platforms they controlled when they censored someone? Oh yeah, "Go create your own platform."

Anonymous ID: 60a37b Aug. 16, 2023, 7:26 a.m. No.19368901   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

To the Anon I said, "If I want any lip out of you I'll rattle my zipper and dangle a dog treat in front of you face," a week or so ago, I would like to apologize. Shit was rolling down hill during that moment (or was in my perception at the time) and it was wrong for me to take it out on another. I deserved everything in the undertone of that, "Fuck you!"

Anonymous ID: 60a37b Aug. 16, 2023, 8:53 a.m. No.19369352   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

You know, I've been thinking of something recently. I still see people well into middle-age do this, and I'm willing to wager that others here still see this too. You know when you watch a movie or a TV show and there's a real embarrassing moment for the character and the audience will feel that embarrassment and say, "Oh my God" with a smile and then cover their eyes or turn away while they experience the embarrassment or shame or cringe of the character? That used to happen to me a lot, until when I was 19 or so I realized: It's not real. The emotional manipulation is not real. The emotion is real, but its stimulus was not.