>>19420502 (pb)

>Anon, your statement speaks to analysis this anon had never considered. Once stated, the logic was self-proving. Re-read of target post confirmed new understanding.

>It read like someone trying to fake exasperation as if they've been here a long time while also sounding like a pedantic robot.

>Thanks for the new perspective anon.

the persona said he was an actor so I figured he must be on strike.

the 'pedantic robot' comment seems like an insult, to me, so then you thank me.

are you trying to pull off some ironic insult?

or did I actually open your mind to new methods in how to deal with new-shills (or new phags)?

I just figured if it was a real person I'd just tell him the score here.

carry on.

>>19421395

it started long long before that.

if you're talking about old-world gangs, they weren't invented because of prohibition.

I always figured that Jim Carry was an anon.

It was like he was always here, in the early days.

Like he was looking for validation, atoneing for things, trying to make the world better.

I know a lot of people think he's a bad guy, but I never felt that. I thought he was a confused guy, a guy who had to make compromises.

Who from Vancover isn't all F'd up for a while, they get picked, they go to Hollywood, they are famous almost over night.

I think people might be wrong about Jim, either that he's good or he's bad but mostly

for judging him hard, and trashing him all over these breads for years when you have no idea, at all, what is in his heart because he's not one who seems to want to share that.

if you're wrong about jim, are you ready to be wrong about him?

Maybe he was one who would post 'you'd be surprised if you knew . . . ' about how you're interacting with.

Ah, Jim. Complex.

sometimes it seems he made bad choices, but it's not for me to judge him

he used to make me laugh.

>>19421475

everyone loves beautiful people but they know that lust is sinful, and lusting and giving in to it when you're trying to work is time wasting.

everything in it's time, at the appropriate moment.

and there isn't anything wrong to the God given form of a beautiful woman.

so what is wrong with posting all these breasts?

according to (not according to me but it makes sense) CS Lewis it's UNCHARITIBLE to force people to think about sex when they are trying to do other things.

makes sense. The human form is awesome.

what isn't awesome are those who try to make people dwell in their lower chakras and give in to the urges that can be made to flame on.

so all you uncharitble people posting breasts in close up, don't tell me that I'm a prude.

maybe I shouldn't judge you for being unchartible?

but at least I'm telling you what you are doing so maybe you can get back to doing digs and stop trying to distract people from their work.

and years from now if you get back to being faithful, and you are in Confession, you can tell the priest "I was a manipulator and I was uncharitable and I tried to get people obsessed with their sexuality"

>>19421516

I'm not Jim.

but I think he used to interact with me here.

>>19421519

are you trapped in your bigoted methodologies of anti-Catholic shilling?

>>19421535

seriously?

no, I have nothing against the God given form.

what I object to are manipulators who use breasts as a trigger to get people to stop doing what they are doing and to start doing what they hadn't planned to do, and actually perhaps didn't want to do.

get it?

manipulation is uncharitble.

if I feel compelled to look at the beauty of a fetching woman I'll watch a movie with one in it (or many. I suggest a 3D movie called 'Coming at Cha' if you really want a good take on that subject

but to post it all the time?

not cool.

>>19421572

you mock.

but at least you understand my argument.

>>19421590

that is so not true.

it was just kept in a sane environment and in a limited time span.

>>19421600

he's a real person.

he deserves to not be treated the way you treat him.

if he kills himself, and he has not repented, then isn't that just too sad for words.

he's still alive, walking around, and there is plenty of time for him to have a third act and be totally awesome and holy.

>>19421664

why make it a Fed note?

you don't understand what a Fed note is?