>>19426197 Donald Trump's twitter gets over 65 million views in a little over 5 hours, there's no one on Earth who can match those #'s PN

This pic anon tool is Almost exactly 10 hours later Trump’s mugshot has doubled to 130.3 million views. It will pick up faster because people are awake and checking social media. 65 million more over night is not bad though. I bet Elon is jumping for joy he’s back! Trump might help save Twitter from financial ruin.

Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

http://DONALDJTRUMP.COM

9:38 PM · Aug 24, 2023

130.3M Views

>>19427006 U.S. Secret Service w/CAP: And finally, after a long, hard day, they rest. PN

That picture is not about the SS protecting Bidan its about Trump yesterdayBidan is hanging out in Tahoe eating ice cream and exercising (kek, doubtful about the exercise)

Bongino and others commented on the accelerated threats on Trumps life yesterday:

I watched the RSBN video of Trump at the airport and leaving Atlanta.I noticed Trump’s security and SS yesterday in Atlanta seemed to be tripled?When he got on the plane to leave, I counted about 30-40 security outside the plane, (those were the ones seen, we didn't see the snipers etc hidden surrounding the plane and vehicles), and there was about that many or more, SS and Security that got on the plane before and after him. I’ve never seen that many. Plus he was not seen or filmed going or coming out of the jail in ATL, in other indictments, its been semi public.

>>19426771 Gen. Flynn: To My Friends and Fellow Citizens - We Have a War to Wage PN

Last portion of Flynn’s article:

There are countless wars to be fought, and evil still needs to be defeated around the world on distant shores. While there are many men and women willing to risk their lives to ensure that evil doesn’t come to our shores, suddenly what we thought unfathomable in our lifetimes has arrived.

We now have a responsibility to them and to ourselves to stand up right here, at home, for the very same causes we once thought would only be found on distant shores. It was once said that a man (or woman) who stands for nothing will fall for anything.

While I understand the idea of not wanting to offend others, there comes a time when the gray area between right and wrong must form at least a thin black line. We each must choose on which side we stand. Will you be one who is marching uphill while lifting the fallen or one whose feet and courage give way on the slimy, slippery slope of timid indecisiveness?

Have faith and be proud of our heritage! Do not be intimidated or ashamed of wrongs committed in the past, or even of generational sins for which blame does not rest upon your shoulders. Many of us have no idea what our ancestors did or did not do, but I speak for myself and at least most of you when I say that we have worked toward a better America and will continue to do so!

I believe that we will be victorious. And while it may appear that the last of the highest mountains in our United States is about to be engulfed in the rising waters of a socialist tide, the strength and resilience of America’s tree of liberty will never let this happen.

Are our freedoms under attack?

It will take effort and consistency. Yes, our local actions will have a national impact if we weigh in together. We must join hands in this battle for America and for true freedom.

There are those who are seeing through rose-tinted glasses the ideologies of failed governments and lost people. That road has been traveled by many before us and, in most cases, has been a one-way street to destruction from which there was no recovery. I am sure that there are many good-hearted people who believe the daily lies told by those who wish to see America brought to its knees at the feet of all countries, including third-world countries, whose people continue to endure sad and wretched lives.

You see, my friends and fellow citizens; we have a war to wage. The enemy is a tough, moving, difficult-to-distinguish individual who comes in the form of a dangerous ideology, a threat to our very way of life. A famous military theorist,Carl von Clausewitz, stated, “Every age has its own kind of war, its own limiting conditions, and its own peculiar preconceptions.” Our conditions include a war of narratives, or, to be more precise, a war of distractions.

We are being attacked on so many fronts that we cannot see from which direction the attacks are coming. The institutions that we should trust, such as the media, our education system, our justice system (including some in the judiciary), our political leaders and, yes, even our church leaders have let us down, allowing those on the slippery slope to weaken the important messages of freedom and liberty and the battle plans those American citizens need so desperately to hear.

We must not bend to the pressure of the day. Ours is not a choice, but a necessity. We have a responsibility to those who come after us, those future generations of Americans who count on us at this moment as we counted on generations throughout our nation’s storied history.

We cannot selfishly hold dear to our hearts the freedoms, rights and privileges that were handed to us; instead, we must try to imagine what it must have been like for those who truly risked their lives to escape a regime to get to this country, especially for those whose blood now runs deep in our very soil from their sacrifices and respect for God, authority, our flag and respect itself.

So put on your helmet, take up your shield, stand strong. Chin up, back straight and do what you know is right. It may be the harder choice, one fraught with risk and the loss of family members and friends, but you’ll sense right away that it is the necessary and right choice to make.

May all who come after us find our choices authentic and honest, as difficult as they will be. May they also find us faithful. Our words and actions in these challenging times will be captured for all of human history.

And if we remain true to who we are as a nation, built upon a set of Judeo-Christian principles and values, we will be like Miracle, a survivor thriving with life — like the tree of liberty, able to withstand the storms raging around us.May our feet forever remain firm in freedom’s soil.

https://www.westernjournal.com/gen-flynn-friends-fellow-citizens-war-wage/?

>>19427613

Wow, the assholes at CNN and the media are way to late. On MSDNC yesterday Nicole Wallace was joking about Trump being assassinated and was gleeful he was going to a very dangerous jail on GA, where 3 prisoners were killed there in the last month. She was really excited reporting Trump was indicted and in danger, it was not treated at all like a serious or somber event.These people are really fucking sick!

You can watch it starting at 5:20 to 6:00 minutes. If you don’t want to watch the whole thing, check this out. Bannon said Nicole and others were laughing and joking Trump all afternoon on MSDNC

Donald Trump Jr. : "Trump scares them Steve, he's the only one that can take on that system"

https://rumble.com/embed/v38qr5h/?pub=4

>>19427613

I’m starting to make a list of the first media journalists , commentators, & propagandists I want are arrested first, and honestly the women commentators are more viscous and hateful then even the men! The men are mostly woke pussies programmed to do what women tell them

Nicole Wallace

Barnett

Mika B

Caitlin Collins

Morning Joe: He belongs in the female category, because he’s a fucking pussy

Anons please add to the list, if interested

>>19427394 Trump Indictments Are Unconstitutional Due to Double Jeopardy, Have No Merit PN

Interesting details for anons that would like to read the article:

Trump Indictments Are Unconstitutional Due to Double Jeopardy, Have No Merit

Patrick Webb August 24, 20231/2

The Constitution’s Article II, Section 1 states that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” As a result, President Donald Trump has executive authority granted to him by virtue of his office. Certain benefits and even executive immunity flow from that power. These privileges include those that are specifically listed in the Constitution. For instance, the impeachment procedure stipulates in Article II, Section 4, that for all “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the president “shall be removed from Office.”

In other words, the Constitution specifies a procedure for the prosecution of American presidents: impeachment. The peculiar nature of the office of the president calls for impeachment rather than ordinary prosecution (and associated penalties like incarceration). As a result of his position, the president exposes himself to excessive media attention, controversy, and risk. Therefore, the punitive measures that are specific to executive officeholders are in line with the responsibilities and authority of the office. Additionally, one could argue that regardless of the personality and fitness of the office’s holder, the president has a specific constitutional right to protect the office’s integrity. That would specifically entail refraining from imprisoning the officeholder or prior occupants of the office due to alleged criminal activity committed while the officeholder was president. Because of this, the Department of Justice has affirmed that “to wound [the President] by a criminal proceeding is to hamstring the operation of the whole governmental apparatus, both in foreign and domestic affairs.” (Memorandum from Robert G. Dixon, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, OLC, Re: Amenability of the President, Vice President, and Other Civil Officers to Federal Criminal Prosecution While in Office 30 [September 24, 1973]). Due to the disastrous effect that such accusations would unavoidably have on the nation’s democratic system, how extensive the extent of such capacities while in office should be construed according to a liberal interpretation.

In any case, the factual grounds upon which President Trump is alleged to have committed a crime or crimes while performing his official duties as president have already been twice considered by the House of Representatives, for which the president—in accordance with Article II, Sec. 4—was acquitted both times by the Senate. This is relevant for the purposes of what is relevant in Jack Smith’s two indictments. All available legal remedies have been used up as a result of the Senate’s decision not to convict President Trump of the alleged crimes he committed. Therefore, continuing to bring charges against the president for the alleged crimes for which he has already been tried is by definition an abuse of judicial power and a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against double jeopardy: “…nor shall any person be subject to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb for the same offence.”

Notably, Article I, Section 3’s Impeachment Judgment Clause states that “a person convicted upon an Impeachment, shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment, according to law.” A straightforward interpretation of the phrase permits the indictment only after a person has been found guilty. This is in accordance with the long-standing judicial construction principle known as expressio unius est exclusio alterius, which states that because the relevant clause does not include the word “acquittal,” the framers intended that only officeholders who had already been found guilty of their alleged crimes would be subject to further investigation. As a result, officeholders who had already been exonerated based on constitutional procedure were not subject to further investigation. Wells Fargo Bank v. United States, 485 U.S. 351, 357 (1988)….

https://theleadingreport.com/2023/08/24/trump-indictments-are-unconstitutional-due-to-double-jeopardy-have-no-merit/

>>19428049

2/2

This interpretation is also backed by common sense: according to constitutional procedure, any officeholder who is convicted while in office is required to resign from their position; it is unimaginable that any officeholder would continue in office after being found guilty of a crime. However, because there is a natural continuity in the prosecutorial function after removal from office, a post-conviction prosecution, as opposed to an acquittal, runs a lesser risk of being in violation of double jeopardy and is therefore expressly authorized by Article I, Sec. 3. In fact, more time may be needed to prosecute the case to the fullest extent of the law. The criminal trial has yet to proceed past the conviction, according to constitutional procedure. Contrarily, if an officeholder were found not guilty of an alleged crime and served the remainder of his or her term in office, it would not make sense to reopen a criminal case based largely on the same factual evidence that led to the acquittal after that person left their position. Specifically, after some time had passed since that person was found not guilty, completed their term, and then became a private citizenThe latter situation clearly runs the risk of double jeopardy (and defies logic).…

Even though the issue is still periodically contested, numerous significant early legal commentary and court rulings strongly favor the latter viewpoint. As one editor of Blackstone’s Commentaries, St. George Tucker, points out, “A conviction upon an impeachment is no bar to a prosecution upon an indictment, so perhaps, an acquittal may not be a bar.” Blackstone’s Commentaries, 1 St. George Tucker, 337 & n* (Philadelphia: William Y. Burch et al., 1803, reprint 1996). In Justice Story’s 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution, he expresses his conviction in the above stated interpretation of double jeopardy: “In case of an acquittal,” he wrote, “there cannot be another trial of the party for the same offence in the common tribunals of justice.” This is an even stronger argument for this interpretation. (2 Commentaries on the Story). Similar to the New Hampshire Constitution of 1784, which contained the first bill of rights to explicitly establish a double jeopardy clause, this viewpoint is shared by several state constitutions that precede the federal Constitution but yet offered interpretive guidance. Acquittal is taken into account in the double jeopardy provision of the New Hampshire Constitution: “No subject shall be liable to be tried, after an acquittal, for the same crime or offence.” The Federal and State Constitutions, 4 F. Thorpe, Art. I, Sec. XCI, reproduced in H.R. Doc. No. 357, 59th Congress, 2d Sess. 2455 (1909).

A more recent OLC letter from 2000 states that after a constitutional impeachment results in acquittal, all available legal remedies for redressability have been exhausted; as a result, bringing charges against the officeholder in the future would be a flagrant instance of double jeopardy. According to this theory, the OLC memo acquiesced, saying: “Even if one took the view that the Impeachment Judgment Clause’s reference to ‘the party convicted’ implied that acquitted parties could not be criminally prosecuted, that implication would naturally extend only to individuals who had been impeached by the House and acquitted by the Senate.” “Whether a Former President May Be Indicted and Tried for the Same Offense for Which He Was Impeached by the House and Acquitted by the Senate,” 24 Op. O.L.C. 110, 112 n.2 (2000).

According to the Supreme Court, “the Double Jeopardy Clause prohibits merely punishing twice, or attempting a second time to punish criminally, for the same offense.” Mitchell v. Helvering, 303 U.S. 391, 399 (1938). There is simply no alternative kind of legal redress that is allowable under the Constitution because the president has already been prosecuted—twice—for the alleged crimes supporting both of Jack Smith’s charges.

To sum up, Jack Smith’s allegations are unfounded; to the degree they have any merit at all, they have already been investigated to the utmost extent permitted by the Constitution, and on each count,President Trump has already been cleared of all criminal wrongdoing.

https://theleadingreport.com/2023/08/24/trump-indictments-are-unconstitutional-due-to-double-jeopardy-have-no-merit/

>>19428053

“Contrarily, if an officeholder were found not guilty of an alleged crime and served the remainder of his or her term in office, it would not make sense to reopen a criminal case based largely on the same factual evidence that led to the acquittal after that person left their position. Specifically, after some time had passed since that person was found not guilty, completed their term, and then became a private citizenThe latter situation clearly runs the risk of double” jeapordy.

Anons am I interpreting this right?

So it seems from that paragraph Bidan has to be charged with a crime before leaving office, otherwise he cannot be convicted for it after? Maybe impeachment should come in mid 2024

>>19428054

The interesting thing is the gov is violating all our rights, they are trying to destroy it forever.

Many constitutional experts agree almost everything Bidan admin does is law breaking.The real question will Trump ever get a non corrupt comped judge?These judges hold the power and a SC case would take 5-7 years to get there to overturn it, all the DS is looking for that length of time to destroy him and us. Hell Jack Smith should have been permanently disbarred multiple times but he wasn’t.

The article is great, but will judges obey the law? This is themain problem for Trump and the country! Lawfare, is their game.

>>19427974

True that, but the absolute love the people have for him and he has for us and the Country, is a phenomena that rarely comes along in 100s of years. This is a God time and cycle

>>19427685

So freakin true. Trump hung out and were friends with blacks forever, he knows gansta tactics, and he had to negotiate with the New England mafia. He learned a thing or two. This truly is the real warrior Trump, he doesn’t want war but if one comes he will win.

>>19427710

This guy us even hated by own Cabal. Blah, Blah, Blah, he’s an Al Gore light. His whole job is money laundering and stealing from poor countries. He should be called the Blackmail Czar

>>19427732

Great idea, seconded

>>19427749

You’re right, but I think he just gave the Top Military etc the GO ORDER, that is the real Commander in Chief look. This is not about revenge, its about Justice to be restored to our Nation and defeat the WW Cabal!

It had to be this way!

(If Q had said this in the beginning, I would have had more patience, but it had to be this way! Kek)

>>19427783

This is to add to the panic of Covid redux, “more fear, more fear, our control os not working”

>>19427799

NASA is filled with Satanists and a division of the sprawling CIA

>>19427829

100s of millions should get the mugshot shirt, but a much better design than that one.

Maybe at the top it says:

I stand with Trump, you can’t lock all of us up

Remember when Cheyenne Mountain Military facility was shut down by Trump on Mar 15, 2020, it never opened again. Q level stuff. Wartime President. Does anyone see a connection with Norad, Cheyenne Mtn and Spaceforce? I do!

POSTED INMilitary

Peterson, Schriever, Cheyenne Mountain to become Space Force bases

The bases will be renamed Schriever Space Force Base, Peterson Space Force Base and Cheyenne Mountain Space Force Station

Sandra Erwin

July 21, 2021

Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)Click to share on Clipboard (Opens in new window)

PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. – The north gate on Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado, is the busiest gate on base, with peak traffic times being from 7:30-8:30 a.m. and 4-5:30 p.m., according to Tim Omdal, 21st Security Forces Squadron deputy director. If more people switch their commute and drive on base through the west gate, this could help alleviate traffic at the north gate, Omdal said. (Courtesy photo)

WASHINGTON — Peterson Air Force Base, Schriever Air Force Base and Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station will officially become U.S. Space Force bases.

These Colorado-based installations are home to the largest concentration of Space Force personnel. Space Force units there conduct space control, surveillance, missile defense and other operational missions.

The bases will be renamed Schriever Space Force Base, Peterson Space Force Base and Cheyenne Mountain Space Force Station in ceremonies planned for July 26.

“The new names will better reflect the installations roles in the U.S. Space Force,” the spokesman said. “This action is part of the overall initiative by the Department of the Air Force to establish a unique identity and culture within the U.S. Space Force.”

Since the Space Force was established in December 2019, former Air Force bases focused on space have been rebranded, including Patrick Space Force Base and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, New Boston Space Force Station in New Hampshire, and Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

The one remaining Air Force base that has yet to be renamed is Los Angeles Air Force Base, home of the Space and Missile Systems Center. The Space Force plans to replace SMC with a new Space Systems Command to be based at the Los Angeles base.

https://spacenews.com/peterson-schriever-cheyenne-mountain-to-become-space-force-bases/