>>19435130 (pb)
not me, anon.
I admit perhaps I shouldn't involve myself with stating that someone is a manipulator or a gate keeper.
but a shill? not even.
if the Maui market is so hot and the per square feet price is so high, even with this disaster, why should the government subsidize building any of it?
even with this disaster the investment ought to give a great return.
I say give money straight to the victims of the fire and do not give a penny to any developers and third parties who didn't get burned out of their homes.
but the way it works: FEMA hands money to contractors who don't even live there to rebuild it all, and then welfare subsidizes the rents . . .
so the money never goes to the locals but to the overlords.
so it's the ones who get free money for doing nothing trying to make a new city to profiteer off of green subsidies?
>>19434889 (pb)
can someone explain this?
>1st Jill kicked out now Hunter. Let's see where Joe sleeps now that he has no baby sitter to help him in the residence.
Jill is kicked out?
Thank You.
I had not heard this.
the question that I have then, if this is so, who is his caregiver when he's at that building?
and also why is this not a kind of elder abuse, the guy is obviously a dementia patient?
I know you don't have the answers to the question of why it isn't elder abuse.
do you have insight into who his caregivers are now?
'made the modern world'?
maybe in the sense of 'made man', as in criminal who has been initiated into an organization.
but it sure sounds like Jill is just a secondary, and puppet, too.
could it be that Biden is a prisoner and doesn't even know it?
wow, my fiction writer's mind kicked in and make up BS conjecture isn't going to help except that I find it fun.
it won't help to share it.
I guess I don't really think of President Trump as the current president but maybe he really is.
I get what you mean.
I think we had a sea change here at the last maintenance, which I think was Monday afternoon or so.
some of the everyday posts (the time keepers) seem missing.
and all the babble-shills with their anti-ethnic constant poison seem ebbed to almost nothing . . .
I noted that the time keeper posts were gone and got hardly any response.
and I post stuff that goes against the 'boobs, boobs, and more and bigger busty boobs bursting out' and don't hardly get called out on it!
so things here are different since at least last Monday (the 21st)
"you are complicit"
sounds rather judgemental of you, anon.
perhaps these children only existed on ledgers and got subsidies and welfare that other people used for themselves and those children never really existed?
or they were aborted but listed as born and got benefits the whole time . . .
(pretty dark)
who audits the census?
how does the public know that counts are correct?