https://healthimpactnews.com/2023/we-have-replaced-wisdom-with-technology-and-we-will-suffer-the-consequences/

We Have Replaced Wisdom with Technology and We Will Suffer the Consequences

He has somewhat of a contrarian view I think, but it still seems to have some merit.

Quote: "It has been a while since I have published an article on the coming Big Tech crash that began in 2022.

There has been a bit of a reprieve to this coming crash here in 2023, with the $trillions of dollars being invested into the AI hype, but all that is doing is creating a huge economic bubble that is going to make the Big Tech crash even worse when this economic bubble bursts."

>>19526906

Would this be considered impersonating an official or impersonating a federal official?

>>19527288

>every single law, Act, EO, everything, will be undone and deemed null and void.

Do you know who Mark Taylor is? He has predicted/prophesied something to the effect that Obama will be stripped of the Presidency. I think this means that his work with the pen and the phone will be rescinded due to the non-US born Obama being an unlawful President.

>>19527310

>Both are currently in Hebron, KY. So will need to fly into Andrews before the flight tomorrow.

Biblical reference.

>>19527309

For starters it could mean that all the criminals could be sued personally and their ill gotten goods given to victims.

To me you seem to be whining.

Here are some things that come to my mind immediately if "Obamacare" were overturned: Would we be able to reclaim medical privacy? At this time EHRs and the massive (unlawful) data collection on Americans means that there are probably avatars made of people so they can be digitally manipulated. Could we start to dismantle this? How about getting fee-for-service back? How about getting the IRS nosiness on our choice to purchase health insurance ended?

>>19527326

I think what might make them impersonating is if they didn't take an oath or affirmation that they were "required" to take. Also if they took office fraudulently, perhaps. I think for example, that Katie Hobbs in Arizona will really be in hot water as it sure looks like she may have been involved in some capacity in cheating in her own election. If you knew you got in by cheating and had no valid oath, what would that make you?

I think some of them would rather be caught impersonating an official because maybe that is a less severe crime than treason.

>>19527345

Why is there a conjugation of sorts in there? When I read this one I thought "How does Q know I am not or someone else is not a prophet?"

I, You, We

Of course the point is taken that Q research should be for research, though I admit I do like to contemplate various prophecies/predictions, but only from people I have come to respect.

The drop says "false prophets".

>>19527423

>is there an overarching "conspiracy" among parties to pursue a certain direction?

I think there is. I think Hillary Clinton was identifying this when she "projected" (in my opinion, anyway) about a "vast right wing conspiracy". I do think there is a vast left wing conspiracy as I see evidence of it in many places.

Criminal rap is good. I like the opportunity for people to sue officials directly due to loss of civil rights for actions taken "under color of law".

Pic related. I think that New Mexico governor could be sued in this manner.

>>19527528

Intentional sabotage sounds plausible, too.

>>19527571

Why don't houses have lightning rods any more?