Anonymous ID: 65f740 Sept. 15, 2023, 10:14 a.m. No.19556268   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6289 >>6306

>>19556192

At 20s he's already wrong. The purpose of the constitution is not to limit government. We can show that easily.

 

The bill of rights it could be said does that. Which was added after the bank bill was passed and the right to print fiat was given away to rothschild. The constitution as a whole is a more typical document

Anonymous ID: 65f740 Sept. 15, 2023, 10:35 a.m. No.19556371   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6381

>>19556306

>are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people

Who decides whether it's reserved to the states or to the people?

The answer is it's to the states first and it's always to the states. And the courts deicde which and it's always to the states. So you BOLD that part, but it doesn't limit government at all. It merely shifts government.

 

The states take care of the administrative parts of government for the big bosses. And the counties more so. And the cities more so.

 

The united states has more layers of government than most of the world, and most of it is crap.

 

But yet you consider this a "limiting" effect? Seriously?

 

This is nothing but wishful thinking. John Wayne movie politics. Not reality

Anonymous ID: 65f740 Sept. 15, 2023, 10:39 a.m. No.19556396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6409

>>19556381

>supposed to be

per who?

Don't you know that man means servant?

man is hand. Latin. You are nothing but a hand, a servant, and it's codified in your language.

No one ever put "serfs & peasants" on top.

This is just ridiculous