dChan
Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 8 p.m. No.19586755   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6774 >>7040 >>7182 >>7294 >>7402 >>7511

21 Sep, 2023 01:18

Kiev’s ‘terrorist attacks’ foiled in several regions – MOD

Ukraine sent more than 20 drones to strike Russian territory, the Defense Ministry said

 

The Russian troops have thwarted Kiev’s plan to conduct “terrorist attacks” in several regions using drones, the Russian Defense Ministry said in the early hours of Thursday.

 

According to the MOD, 19 UAVs were “destroyed” over Crimea and the Black Sea. It added that Kursk, Belgorod and Oryol regions were each attacked by a single drone, all of which were intercepted mid-air.

 

Telegram channel Mash reported that residents heard “explosions” and the sound of anti-air weapons in several locations in Crimea, describing the drone attack as “the most massive one yet.”

 

On Wednesday, Ukrainian troops shelled the village of Maksimovka, killing a civilian and wounding one more person, Belgorod Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said. A woman was injured during an attack on the village of Tyotkino on Monday, according to Kursk Governor Roman Starovoyt.

 

Kiev has stepped up drone and missile attacks on Russian territory in recent months, as Ukraine’s ground counteroffensive launched in early June failed to yield any significant victories. On September 13, cruise missiles struck a shipyard in Sevastopol in Crimea, damaging two Russian naval vessels.

 

(My guess since the UN and leaders are allowing Ukraine to tell their lies and the UN will support them, Russia is going to accelerate their aggression, not because they want to, but the majority of countries agree to support Ukraine and their lie.Or Russia will release all material and data they found that Kiev have implemented, Crimes against Humanity! Either way its going to blow up!)

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/583318-ukrainian-drone-attack-crimea/

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 8:17 p.m. No.19586834   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6840 >>6847 >>6876 >>6902 >>6907 >>7088

Anon doesn’t seek or mind getting notables.But anon enjoyed it when anons commented on the subject and anons had discussions. Anon is not enjoying an “AI notable sniffer picking notables”. As if anons are predictable.

 

In the past anons nominated notables! Back in the day we had great discussions day and night, and anons took on newbies like me in early 2018 and taught me the ropes. And we really laughed.

 

Those days were fun, educational and less performative! And anon interacted with humans!

 

If there are any anons left, please leave, smart, snarky or shitty commentsso I know I’m not in AI world for good! Your comments cannot be reruns!

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 8:39 p.m. No.19586902   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6908 >>6912 >>6916 >>6978 >>7040 >>7182 >>7294 >>7402 >>7511

>>19586834

BTW the only article anon posted that should have been notable, because 4 anons posted significant and interesting comments on it was this one,which was not notable. When this board removes “AI”, shills etc, maybe Autists and Anons may come back for actual researchThis anon is to learn from others tgeir specialities, and what we need to learn to win the real war for our minds. Giving anons more notables as a booby prize is not why I came here. I like learning from the ancient ones and those that have deeper spiritual and philosophical meaning of life, including the strategies war, we need to get back to our mission, otherwise most of us are “shitposting”!

 

F-35 pilot ejected from $100M jet over South Carolina due to ‘bad weather’ as experts reveal why plane couldn’t be tracked

Selim Algar

The pilot who ejected from a $100 million F-35 fighter jet claimed to have lost the plane in the weather — and likely bailed out before he could activate its tracking system, sources and experts said.

“He’s unsure of where his plane crashed, said he just lost it in the weather,” a voice can be heard saying of the pilot on a Charleston County Emergency Medical Services call posted Tuesday by a meteorologist.

 

The unidentified pilot landed in a North Charleston residential neighborhood and was taken to a local hospital for treatment.

 

He has since been discharged.

 

Military officials have not yet released a specific reason for the pilot’s hasty exit, only referring to the incident as stemming from a “malfunction.”

 

The pilot said he lost the plane in bad weather before ejecting to safety.

 

Longtime military aviation expert and consultant Richard Aboulafia told The Post the pilot was likely operating the stealth fighter without any tracking capabilities activated — and ejected before he could do so.

 

“If you turned on the onboard device it would be easily trackable,” he said. “But this is a stealth aircraft. If you don’t turn that particular device on it’s going to be hard to make contact. Most likely, he or she did not have a lot of time to react.”

 

Military officials were compelled to ask for the public’s help in locating the plane — via a post on Facebook.

 

“It’s unusual,” Aboulafia said of that effort. “But what is the harm? The onboard device has not been turned on, it’s not being tracked. So it makes perfect sense that they’re going to ask for help from people in the area who might have seen a jet heading in their direction.”

 

The plane crashed into a rural field in South Carolina Sunday.

 

Officials have sealed off an area near the area where the plane landed

The plane ultimately crashed into a wooded area in South Carolina about 60 miles from where the pilot parachuted to the ground.

 

State law enforcement officers said they officially identified the plane on Monday and have since closed off a one mile stretch of road in Williamsburg County.

 

Local residents in the rural area said they heard an ear piercing screech before a massive boom that shook their homes.

 

Officials have not yet provided a specific “malfunction” that led to the pilot’s ejection.

The jet is part of the U.S. Department of Defense’s priciest weapons system program in the U.S. Department of Defense, according to a May 2023 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

 

The agency is considering modernize the aircraft’s engine.

 

Aboulafia said although the high-tech model may have its issues, it is still considered the top fighter jet around the world and is coveted by a long list of governments.

 

“I understand the frustration with delays and cost overruns and whatever else,” he said. “But the fact is they can’t produce these fast enough for demand. And that’s the bottom line.”

 

https://nypost.com/2023/09/20/f-35-pilot-ejected-over-south-carolina-due-to-bad-weather/

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 8:43 p.m. No.19586918   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6924

>>19586847

Ok this is dumb to ask, and I never cared in 6 years, and I will be harassed as long as I stay tonight, which is past my schedule for dayshift,But what to fuck is Reddit spacing?.

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 9:07 p.m. No.19587009   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19586916

So are you saying that they intentionally took the chance of crashing it to see if AI could handle every aspect of it?

 

Or the plane was programmed to fly and land itself?

 

Or headquarters was flying the plane and ejected the pilot to see how advanced they were?

 

Why did they bring attention to the ejected pilot, seemingly frightened, and then crash it?

 

Was it the the NWO running our country, that wanted to humiliate the country even more than Afghanistan and they were giving signs to our enemies, you can conquer America soon?

 

Or was the whole thing a total fake out by Cheyenne Mountain to make is look week when we are strong?

 

So what were you insinuating, because I have a couple of more theories?

 

In the past the military would abdolutely cover up their fuck ups, this is not what the mikitary would ever do, except maybe under Austin, but its highly unusual to ask the public to help; especially since they could track it or send planes up to find it.

 

Does this have anything to do with our long gone messenger?

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 9:30 p.m. No.19587105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19587088

Thanks moar better anon, but I have a tendency of saying I, when others refer to themselves as anon. I’ll stick with trying to fit in as much as I’m able. Kek

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 9:34 p.m. No.19587121   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19586845

I actually do not think he’s flipped, when he gets on the stand he’ll tell the truth. He had to fake them out because he’s already been so beaten up. Agreed anon

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 10:13 p.m. No.19587222   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7294 >>7321 >>7402 >>7511

RINO law Professor has dramatic about-face: now says 14th Amendment CAN’T remove Trump from ballot…

It’s truly disheartening when so-called “cherished” conservative institutions fall prey to Stage 5 TDS and careen off course. Sadly, this isn’t an uncommon occurrence, though it does offer us a chance to see how many of our supposed allies are, in fact, establishment RINOs. Even so, it’s a tiresome pattern we’ve witnessed repeatedly. And speaking of that pattern, recently, the founder of the “conservative” law group The Federalist Society, Steven Calabresi, made a surprising assertion, claiming that those attempting to remove Trump from the ballot using the 14th Amendment were justified and could likely succeed in their efforts.

 

Get this — Calabresi actually sat down with Norm Eisen (of Revolver News fame) back in January of 2021 and wrote an op-ed for the New York Times (archive link) saying Trump should be charged and impeached before he left office, or even afterwards, so that he could never hold office ever again.

 

Liberal activists and self-proclaimed “constitutional scholars” spanning the political spectrum have rallied behind the “14th Amendment theory,” asserting that Trump’s post-2020 election conduct disqualifies him from seeking future public office. This notion has garnered a wide array of supporters with varying political perspectives.

 

What’s truly disconcerting and thoroughly un-American is when uni-party regime elites attempt to remove the most popular candidate from the ballot using these questionable tactics. Last time we checked this was America, not North Korea. This kind of plotting goes against the principles of fair and democratic elections. Unfortunately, it’s become a recurring theme with the Trump-haters, who, in the pursuit of his downfall, are willing to cast aside even the most fundamental standards of our democratic process. The ends always justify the means when it comes to taking down Trump.

However, Steven’s commitment to the “14th Amendment” approach has proven to be short-lived. In a striking and rather dramatic change of heart, he now contends that Trump ‘isn’t covered’ by the 14th Amendment. His reversal stems from a newly published article that has swayed Steve’s opinion, arguing that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the president and he’s free to run for office.

 

The Messenger:

 

Law professor Steven Calabresi, who helped found the conservative legal group the Federalist Society, reversed his position on whether former President Donald Trump can appear on ballots due to the Constitution’s 14th Amendment and says he now thinks the former president cannot be barred from running.

 

“Former President Donald Trump isn’t covered by the disqualification clause, and he is eligible to be on the ballot in the 2024 presidential election,” Calabresi said in a letter to the Wall Street Journal.

 

[…]

 

He said his opinion was swayed by a new article that argued the phrase “officer of the United States” does not apply to the president for the purposes of Section 3, which states that no elected official in the U.S. can engage in “insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

 

Sure, it’s commendable that Steven was open-minded enough to recognize the flaws in his previous stance. Nevertheless, the unfortunate reality is that many self-proclaimed “experts” often succumb to the trap of Trump Derangement Syndrome, leading them to make misguided judgments driven more by their political biases than their common sense or professional expertise.

 

https://revolver.news/2023/09/rino-law-professor-has-dramatic-about-face-now-says-14th-amendment-cant-remove-trump-from-ballot/

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 10:18 p.m. No.19587240   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7294 >>7402 >>7511

The Bidens: "Stone Cold Crooked" (9) – When Can We Start Calling It What It Is, Namely Bribery?

September 19, 2023/ Francis Menton

The Biden family corruption scandal gets deeper with every passing day. Speaker Kevin McCarthy finally opened an impeachment investigation in the House last week, and now the first hearing in that investigation has been scheduled for September 28 before the House Oversight Committee.

So what is the potential impeachable offense? You will undoubtedly recall, in the context of the two Trump impeachments, the endless semantic contortions that took place trying to shoe-horn Trump’s conduct into the vague constitutional catchall of “high crimes and misdemeanors” that might support an impeachment. Now, with Biden, the conduct at issue goes by various euphemisms like “the family business,” “business dealings with foreign nationals,” “influence peddling,” “selling access,” or maybe just “corruption.” But are these impeachable offenses?

Well, how about “bribery”? In Biden’s case, there is no need for creative legal argumentation. Biden’s crime is right there in the list set out in Constitution Article II, Section 4:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

And yet for some reason participants in the public discussion of the Bidens’ conduct seem remarkably reluctant to call a spade a spade. The reluctance spans both sides of the political divide, and even extends to the websites of the House of Representatives that discuss the ongoing investigations. Here are a few recent examples (out of hundreds):

From NBC News, May 10: “The Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee mounted more attacks Wednesday against President Joe Biden and his family, alleging that relatives of the president engaged in business with foreign nationals. . . .”

From ABC News, September 14: “[O]n Capitol Hill, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy this week said he would initiate an impeachment inquiry against President Biden over his alleged role in his son's influence-peddling. . . .”

From the New York Post, August 14: “The evidence that President Joe Biden benefited directly from son Hunter’s influence-peddling operation just keeps mounting.”

From PBS, today: “Republicans — led by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy — have contended in recent weeks that Biden’s actions from his time as vice president show a “culture of corruption,” and that his son used the “Biden brand” to advance his business with foreign clients.”

Or even from the House Oversight Committee itself, September 13: “There is mounting evidence that Joe Biden was involved in his family’s influence peddling schemes, including while he served as Vice President.”

“Bribery” is not a complicated crime to understand. It has its own section of the U.S. criminal statutes, 18 U.S.C. Section 201. In case there were any doubt what this is about, the title of the section is “Bribery of public officials and witnesses.” Here are the parts of that section relevant to Biden’s conduct:

(b) Whoever—(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly . . . seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act; . . .

shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

Read through that, and you find that the crime of bribery of a public official only has three elements: (1) “corruptly seek[ing], receiv[ing] [or] accept[ing] anything of value”; (2) “in return for”; and (3) “being influenced in the performance of any official act.”

Of the various instances of corruption in….

It’s high time that everybody stopped calling Biden’s alleged wrongdoing by euphemisms like “influence peddling” or “foreign business dealings” — neither of which are terms specifically referencing an impeachable offense, let alone a crime. We should all start using the correct and obviously applicable constitutional and statutory term, which is “bribery.”

 

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2023-9-19-the-bidens-stone-cold-crooked-9-when-can-we-start-calling-it-what-it-is-namely-bribery

Anonymous ID: acbe98 Sept. 20, 2023, 10:26 p.m. No.19587257   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7286

New book lies to kids: falsely claims Stonehenge was built when Britain was a “black country”…

 

September 20, 2023 (a day ago)

It’s quite puzzling why there’s such a fervor among blacks to appropriate historical narratives. This phenomenon occurs frequently, with many blacks laying claim to well-documented historical

 

Unfortunately, this has led to substantial disinformation campaigns that are effectively rewriting history. Many historians remain silent, fearful of facing potential backlash from a radical cancel mob that’s more concerned with narratives and messaging than facts and truth.

Another perfect example of this disturbing phenomenon centers around a new kids book that just came out called “Brilliant Black British History,” which incorrectly claims that Stonehenge was erected at a time when Britain was a “black country.” That’s not true. According to historians, the first black African people in Britain arrived under the Roman Empire around 300 A.D. Stonehenge was constructed during the Bronze Age between 3000 and 2000 B.C. But that didn’t stop a Nigerian-born author from re-telling the story a totally different way.

Daily Mail:

Stonehenge was built by black people, a new children’s history book has claimed.

Readers of Brilliant Black British History, by the Nigerian-born British author Atinuke, are told the neolithic monument in Wiltshire was built while Britain was a ‘black country’.

The book, which is aimed at children aged seven and above, also tells readers that ‘every single British person comes from a migrant’ and that the ‘very first Britons were black’

The introduction adds that Britain has been ‘mostly a white country for a lot less time than it has been mostly a black country’.

Atinuke also claims that the remains of the 10,000-year-old Cheddar Man belonged to someone who had ‘skin as dark as dark can be’.

Could this be the reason why the left is toppling statues worldwide? Are they attempting to obliterate history and reshape to line up with their political agenda?

Her’s a closeup of the image from Daily Mail.

As you can see, historically, the timelines simply don’t add up. But don’t take our word for it. The fine folks over at English Heritage would beg to differ with this books claim.

The black history of Britain is by its nature a global history. Yet too often it is seen as being only the history of migration, settlement and community formation in Britain itself.’

– David Olusoga, Black and British: A Forgotten History

Black histories are a vital part of England’s story, reaching back many centuries. There is evidence of African people in Roman Britain as far back as the 3rd century AD, and black communities have been present since at least 1500.

English Heritage is committed to telling the story of England in full. Black history, from antiquity to the 21st century, helps us to reflect on the connections between the past and present, and the importance of history to our understanding of what’s happening today.

 

This rewriting of history jibes with an entertainment industry which is also engaged in its own version of woke historical

It’s disheartening to witness a time in America when truth and facts take a backseat and the main focus revolves around race-driven propaganda fueled by guilt.

 

https://revolver.news/2023/09/new-book-lies-to-kids-falsely-claims-stonehenge-was-built-when-britain-was-a-black-country/