Anonymous ID: efef1a Oct. 10, 2023, 9:05 a.m. No.19707844   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>19707775

>forgive us our debts

>and we will forgive our debtors

 

Hummm…

What IF there was another version?

ONE that would be ATTACKED at the SOURCE? And continues on today…

4 Drops "Why are we attacked…"

https://qalerts.app/?q=why+are+we+attacked

 

Why was the Lord's prayer posted?

Which version?

Why is this relevant?

 

Lord's Prayer

 

Relationship between the Matthaean and Lucan texts

In biblical criticism, the absence of the Lord's Prayer in the Gospel of Mark, together with its occurrence in Matthew and Luke, has caused scholars who accept the two-source hypothesis (against other document hypotheses) to conclude that it is probably a logion original to theQ source.[7] The common source of the two existing versions, whetherQor an oral or another written tradition, was elaborated differently in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke.

 

Marianus Pale Hera considers it unlikely that either of the two used the other as its source and that it is possible that they "preserve two versions of the Lord’s Prayer used in two different communities: the Matthean in a Jewish Christian community and the Lucan in the Gentile Christian community".[8]

 

If either evangelist built on the other, Joachim Jeremias attributes priority to Luke on the grounds that "in the early period, before wordings were fixed, liturgical texts were elaborated, expanded and enriched".[9] On the other hand, Michael Goulder, Thomas J. Mosbo and Ken Olson see the shorter Lucan version as a reworking of the Matthaean text, removing unnecessary verbiage and repetition.[10]

 

The Matthaean version has completely ousted the Lucan in general Christian usage,[11] The following considerations are based on the Matthaean version.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord%27s_Prayer