https://www.c-span.org/MyC-SPAN/login/?saveClip=5088041

THANK YOU. IF I COULD MOVE TO A 30,000 FOOT PERSPECTIVE, HOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE SUPPOSED TO DO IN EVALUATING CLEAR ERROR? WE HAVE AN APPENDIX IN THIS CASE THAT IS VAST. LET'S SAY THERE ARE 100 DIFFERENT FACTUAL DETERMINATIONS. IF WE THINK 15 ARE WRONG, DO WE REVERSE FOR CLEAR ERROR IN THAT SITUATION? WE DO NOT NORMALLY REVIEW RECORD OR FACTUAL FINDINGS. I AM WONDERING HOW YOU THINK WE SHOULD DO THAT?