TYB
THE WHOLE LANGUAGE of categorizing people into irreconcilable division of 'how this group is not that group', by race, religion, class, sex, or nation, is all itself driven by minds FIRST 'SEEING THEMSELVES' AS DIVIDED FROM the rest of humanity by those very same categories.
Whenever you see:
"It's the {fill in race or religion or class or sex or nation here}!"
You are not witnessing a mind making an outside observation of what is motivating anyone's actions or statements. You are in fact witnessing a mind writing about ITSELF, you are witnessing how it is dividing itself from humanity first and then using language that makes it appear as though it is claiming to 'see' anything outside itself.
anon opines that the reason why Karl Marx's writings were so influential is not because of its truth value, it has little to none, no, what made it so influential is that it gave EVERY MIND, from academics to philanthropy to art to economics to science to politics, it gave an excuse to abandon self-responsibility and encouraged everyone to behave and speak as if their subjective experiences of self-alienation, of inner division, to be viewed not as psychological phenomena either consistent or inconsistent with the world, but as empirical objective observations of what is driving humanity in its essential nature.
This is why 'they' WANT the people divided! It's so they can reference instantiations of empirical social division CAUSED BY THEIR PRIOR SELF-ALIENATION / INTERNAL DIVISION, and falsely claim that they were never projecting self-division, they are just 'observing' it, and their accusations of the world are 'backed' by empirical observations.
And while people become socially divided this way, WHAT DO THEY NO LONGER SEE? The source of the narrative pushing self-division, including in many instances the sources themselves!
It's always the same PATTERN OF ORDERING THE SEQUENCE OF INFORMATION IN TIME. First you see ENDLESS NARRATIVE patterns, like 'Russia Russia Russia'โฆ.all projections of hatred against a people by religion and raceโฆthen after suitable build up, KINETIC/PRAXIS instantiations of social division are 'supposed' to occur, AND THE NARRATIVE SOURCES POUNCE on those instances and yell from the rooftops that they are the authorities of morality and truth and should decide what happens next.
It's a method of social control, a method to control the temporal order of human development by implementing a dialectic of self-division, of 'opposites', projected out into the world, that is afterwards referenced not as the output of the effect of its own logic being trusted by humanity as 'proof' it's authoritative, but as mere observations of humanity in its essential nature.
END THE ENDLESS BY USING YOUR MIND TO SEE THAT THE SOCIAL DIVISION IS A DELIBERATE 'PRODUCT' OF A SOURCE ARROGATING ITS SELF-ALIENATION DIVISION AS 'OBSERVATIONS'.