>>19857454

one can't 'watch, listen, and read everything'

it isn't physically possible, there isn't enough time.

one must be selective.

any intelligent scholar knows this.

informatin over load is a form of censorship.

and the stuff that you promote, your brag-boast, is BS because you appeal to the ego to try to get people to attend to NONSENSE

that has no value.

nonsense of no value ought to be avoided.

by being selective and discerning you learn things.

you can't possibly read and view 'it all' and saying that isn't something that anyone of intelligence suggests. It's suggested by a operator trying to play mind games and waste people's time.

>>19857475

the intelligent person who studies media understands how the flooding of channels creates havoc.

that is why spam is deleted.

you do these things and then get all upset when YOUR CENSORSHIP is shown as censorship. Flooding and overloading and providing nonsense is what you do TO CENSOR. and then you have the gaul to pretend that I'm about censorship?

you are a master at it, and I merely point out what you are doing. I have NEVER deleted anything here. I merely describe what I see.

slanderer, you should apologize to me.

>>19857527

why are you butting in?

and using a name that is incorrect for me?

sometimes good pepole do apologize.

slander is a serious thing.

>>19857538

my posts describe the situation as I see.

censorship through information overload is a very real thing. You practice it.

I do not.

you are the censor, not me.

>>19857550

I'm not in a competition. I explain what I see.

I see you causing a fuss and smack talking and performing floods of accusations and slander.

that has the effect of making it very hard for others to sort through the posts and find out what is worth reading and reviewing.

you flood the board to disrupt it.

It's a form of censorship.

you do it.

and you slander me for describing the effect claiming that I, in fact, am a censor or that I 'support it'.

I support a useful board.

spam and floods and slander and useless noise and add nothing to Q Research.

you just want conflict and infighting.

you want people to be fed up and leave the board.

that's why you flood in your divisive accusations of slander.

you are the censor in that sense.

Yes, you don't delete anything but what you do is flood the board so that any real information is very hard to identify.

to top it off you insult people, call them names, and act like a jerk to those who comment on your behavior.

>>19857574

ah, a thrid ID.

I see that either a team or a simulated team is doing their intimidation tactics towards those who

see what they are doing

and explain it in real time

for the effect of defusing their nonsense

and exposing them as impotent trolls.

>>19857613

wow.

how do I tell you what kind of can of worms you open up for yourself by claiming that the insanity of flooded discord is from that source.

you poke at things about which you ought to know better, and commit a grevious error that effects you, not me.

you don't speak for Him nor is what is put here to flood from Him.

>>19857686

how will you explain yourself?

>>19857718

BO: these shills are sick.

they will imply that the abomination postings are here to 'train us' and that God (yes they will say God) put them in our path.

they are a sick sick bunch.

>>19857704