Anonymous ID: 5ab242 Nov. 10, 2023, 10:40 a.m. No.19894232   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4247 >>4251 >>4284

PB EIP DisinfoDig

 

>>19893278, >>19893966, >>19894021, >>19894028 EIP/Stanford thread A once-robust alliance of federal agencies, tech companies, election officials and researchers that worked together to thwart foreign propaganda and disinformation has fragmented

 

There are some hits but not seeing a ton of hits in Qresear.ch regarding these fags so putting them on the radar.

 

> https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/announcing-election-integrity-partnership

 

We thankthe Knight Foundationand Craig Newmark Philanthropies for their support of this effort.

 

> https://knightfoundation.org/news-and-information-disorder-in-the-2020-presidential-election/

 

News and Information Disorder in the 2020 Presidential Election

Share:

 

Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

Email

 

Throughout the 2020 election campaign, there were increasing concerns about the spread of false information on social media, as well as discussions regarding the role of platforms in resolving information disorder (i.e., misinformation, dis-information and malinformation). Now that the election is over, we must evaluate the effectiveness of diverse strategies that platforms or media organizations have used, along with the associated ethical and legal ramifications, to address misinformation and disinformation during the election. The Information Society Project at Yale Law School invited leading scholars on misinformation from different disciplines— including communication, computer science, law, psychology and political science—to write about their reflections on important questions that were raised during the presidential campaign and the 2020 Election, particularly related to information disorder created and aggravated by algorithms on social media. You can find the essays below. The essays appear in the order in which they were presented at the Yale ISP conference this fall. Click here to watch the speaker presentations.

Anonymous ID: 5ab242 Nov. 10, 2023, 10:44 a.m. No.19894247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4249 >>4251

>>19894232

>We thankthe Knight Foundation

 

We are social investors who support a more effective democracy by funding free expression and journalism, arts and culture in community, research in areas of media and democracy, and in the success of American cities and towns where the Knight brothers once published newspapers. (Read our Statement of Strategy.)

 

Informed and Engaged Communities

 

The Knight brothers believed that a well-informed community could best determine its own true interests and was essential to a well-functioning, representative democracy. The brothers pursued those beliefs, building and running one of America’s largest and most successful 20th century newspaper companies. (Learn more about the philosophy of the Knight Newspapers.)

 

The Knights formed Knight Foundation to promote excellence in journalism and the success of the communities in which they worked, in the words of Jim Knight. The company was sold, and the foundation, ever evolving, carries on this work.

Our Beliefs

 

We believe in freedom of expression and in the values expressed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

 

We believe an informed citizenry is essential for representative democracy to function effectively.

 

We believe in engaged, equitable and inclusive communities.

Students discuss First Amendment rights at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on April 2. 2016, during a conference sponsored by the Newseum Institute and Knight Foundation. Photo (cc) by Mark Schierbecker on Flickr.

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

 

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are core to our work as a social investor. We believe in the power of diverse perspectives to foster positive change and build stronger, more equitable, and inclusive communities.

 

Much like the Knight brothers’ success in tailoring their newspapers to the cities they served, Knight Foundation takes a dynamic approach to its grantmaking, leveraging opportunities authentic to the diverse and pluralistic communities and fields where we work. We do not adhere to a prescriptive approach to our work. Instead, we embrace flexibility and adaptability, ready to embrace emerging opportunities. We actively seek out skilled, committed, and tenacious leaders who can achieve meaningful outcomes.

Our Programs

Journalism

 

We champion the First Amendment and support journalism excellence in the digital age. Learn more

Communities

 

We invest in cities where the Knight brothers once published newspapers, helping them attract and nurture talent, promote economic opportunity, and foster civic engagement. Learn more

Arts

 

We believe great art connects people to place and each other; we support art that engages, educates and delights residents in ways that are authentic to each community. Learn more

Learning and Impact

 

We seek to understand the broader context of our work and the impact of programs we support. We disseminate information and insight to relevant fields and communities in ways that are frank and clear, and advance learning, social development and future intelligent grant-making

 

The foundation has offices in eight of the 26 Knight communities.

Knight Communities

 

Knight Foundation’s work is national in scope, but it has a special focus on 26 communities where John S. and James L. Knight once published newspapers. Knight has offices in eight of those U.S. cities, and Knight staff work through community foundations in 18 others.

Cities with Knight Foundation offices

 

Knight program directors are your first point of contact in eight large and mid-sized cities where we have offices.

 

Akron, Ohio, Charlotte, North Carolina, Detroit, Macon, Georgia, Miami, Philadelphia, San Jose, California, St. Paul, Minnesota

Anonymous ID: 5ab242 Nov. 10, 2023, 10:44 a.m. No.19894249   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4251

>>19894247

>We thankthe Knight Foundation

 

 

Community Foundations Program

 

Knight works in 18 small to mid-sized communities in partnership with local community foundations. Learn more about this program.

 

Aberdeen, South Dakota

 

Biloxi, Mississippi

 

Boulder, Colorado

 

Bradenton, Florida

 

Columbia, South Carolina

 

Columbus, Georgia

 

Duluth, Minnesota

 

Ft. Wayne, Indiana

 

Gary, Indiana

 

Grand Forks, North Dakota

 

Lexington, Kentucky

 

Long Beach, California

 

Milledgeville, Georgia

 

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

 

Palm Beach County, Florida

 

State College, Pennsylvania

 

Tallahassee, Florida

 

Wichita, Kansas

Anonymous ID: 5ab242 Nov. 10, 2023, 10:46 a.m. No.19894251   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4755

>>19894232

>>19894247

>>19894249

 

Board of Trustees

Francisco L. Borges

 

Chair of the Board and Trustee

Christopher M. Austen

 

Trustee

Ana-Marie Codina Barlick

 

Trustee

Martin “Marty” Baron

 

Trustee

Stephanie Bell-Rose

 

Trustee

Shona L. Brown

 

Trustee

Adriana Cisneros

 

Trustee

Austin Clements

 

Trustee

Ramona Hood

 

Trustee

Susan D. Kronick

 

Trustee

Michael Marsicano, Ph.D.

 

Trustee

Christine Amer Mayer

 

Trustee

Anna Spangler Nelson

 

Trustee

Charles Olson

 

Trustee

Matthew Stepka

 

Trustee

Anonymous ID: 5ab242 Nov. 10, 2023, 12:30 p.m. No.19894755   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19894251

>Board of Trustees

critizing Big Tech because they "let" potus win in 2016 so the Knight foundation got all butthurt

 

Non-profit

John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

James L. Knight portrait (link) by Knight Foundation is licensed CC BY-SA 2.0 (link)

Website:

 

www.knightfoundation.org

Location:

 

Miami, FL

Tax ID:

 

65-0464177

Tax-Exempt Status:

 

501(c)(3)-PF

Budget (2020):

 

Revenue: $183,144,507

Expenses: $117,868,918

Assets: $2,530,104,679

Formation:

 

1950

President:

 

Alberto Ibarguen

Recent Filings:

 

2020 Form 990

Contact InfluenceWatch with suggested edits or tips for additional profiles.

Fields marked with an * are required

Name

Email *

Reason for Contacting *

Message *

 

The Knight Foundation is aleft-leaning private foundation that sets a primary emphasis on funding media-related projects. The foundation, which was seeded by the estate of economically conservative newspaper publisher John S. “Jack” Knight, began by endowing chairs in journalism atuniversities. In the past decade, the foundation has funded non-profit news sites, backed paying the salaries of individual reporters at newspapers, and supported many research projects about how newspapers can remain viable enterprises. In addition, the Knight Foundation gives grants to newspapers such as the Salt Lake City Tribune that have become nonprofits.

 

The Knight Foundation has three major grant areas. In eight cities where the Knight Ridder newspaper chain had newspapers, most notably in Detroit, Miami, and Philadelphia, the foundation has a branch office and funds community-based grants. In eighteen smaller cities, including Ft. Wayne, Indiana and Wichita, Kansas, the foundation has a donor-advised fund operated by a local community foundation. The foundation is also a major funder of arts programs, chiefly based in museums.

 

More recently, as an extension of its media grantmaking, the Knight Foundation supports organizations critical of the dominance of large technology companies such as Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Google.

 

Criticisms of Technology Companies

 

In July 2019, the Knight Foundation announced it would give $50 million to support what it called organizations that would analyze “technology’s role in our democracy.” The foundation allotted $39 million to creating eleven centers at universities affiliated with schools of journalism or communications that would study “the rules that should govern social media and technology companies.” The foundation noted that other foundations had also made grants to these newly created centers, including the Charles Koch Foundation, the Hewlett Foundation, Craig Newmark Philanthropies, and the Omidyar Network. 25

 

In August 2019, the Knight Foundation announced that $6 million of the $50 million would go to three think tanks. The Center for Technology and Society received $3 million for research on “how online platforms moderate content.” The Open Markets Institute was awarded $2 million to examine the “negative effects” of “corporate concentration of internet companies.” The R Street Institute’s $1 million grant would be used to study “a multi-stakeholder approach to the management of online content.” 26

 

In November 2019, the Knight Foundation awarded $3.5 million to21 organizations for short-term projects designed to aid members of Congress, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Department of Justice in their efforts to revise the laws and regulations overseeing technology. Among the organizations receiving grants of between $100,000 and $400,000 were the center-right American Enterprise Institute, the centrist German Marshall Fund, the left-of-center Public Knowledge, and 16 universities, mostly for projects affiliated with law schools. 27