gee, some guy infiltrates the church, is a satanist, rapes people, and you blame millions of faithful catholics.
and now it bugs you that you can't loot that diocese because they have a much saner way of protecting their money becuase of the predation of folks like you.(I say you to get your riled up and thinking and angry so you'll here my message, I know you didn't infiltrate, as a satanist, and rape people, did you?)
and it bugs you that all of those people's donations, people who never did any of that satanistic raping and harming, are protected from the friends or relations of the satanists to be looted.
ok, so my presentation has some holes. obviously not all the victims were relatives of the satanists set up to loot the church.
but answer me this: why should all that money, donated by innocent people, be in the kitty to be looted by those who sue the churches when it's a few people doing it, who infiltrated, perhaps for the very reason of looting the church?
why is there collective responsibility whenother denominations set up their finances differently and no one sues them because they would not get any money from it?
if a priest rapes a person sue the priest.
why is it that they get to sue a 10 million member diocese as if everyone else was also involved when they weren't?
answer me that.