>Censorship. The comp'd board admins created spam as an excuse to delete in along with posts by anons. Anon has proof of this.
ZERO SAUCE.
And there won't be any either because it's not true.
Samples of recent deletions attached. The spoilered images are a beheaded man and a woman tied up with eyes blocked and mouth forced open.
Anons are all familiar with the CP that's been posted, which is removed as quickly as possible, including gore showing murdered children.
kek ;)
Remember when some anons (shills?) protested the posting of bewbs for baker?
Seems like we've come a long ways since then. Nudes are not removed.
Hardcore pron IS removed, this is a research board, not pornhub.
>image of painting of nude male
See your point. Not removed by me, might have been removed if reported by anon. But this is not at all typical. In addition to muh joos, pron, cp, and gore, we also remove spam, which may include some shitposts or other innocuous stuff. (e.g., Vatican Shill).
>hardcore pron & boundaries
Every image is unique, can provide guidelines only. Attached images are the type often posted for bakers, np. Generally: Photos of sex, lesbian sex, tranny sex, gay sex is considered hardcore - so are crotch shots, espec wo/faces. Obviously, stuff showing girls not women is illegal.
The pic you posted is distorted; looks like a dwarf but could be interpreted as a child by some.
This kind of borderline stuff is going to get treated inconsistently. That's just how it is. Most anons have a pretty good idea of what bewbs for baker is about and also what hardcore pron looks like. Stuff that pushes the boundaries will always be a problem.
My question is this: why post it?
Want pron? Start a pron board.