Could we be missing something? Or maybe it is better to say I think I have been missing something. What are we seeing in Israel? Personally I don't feel I really understand the situation, so I've prayed some for the protection of innocent life and for a couple of people who seem to be doing good in Israel. Other than that the details seem above my pay grade and so I've been careful about drawing conclusions, though I much prefer to live around groups of Jews than Muslims, because sharia law is unconstitutional and I think large groups of Muslims are at risk of radicalizing with the blessing of Democrats (or maybe I should say the Uniparty).

Just tonight I got to thinking. What if Israel really is "ethnically cleansing" Gaza (not saying they are) and getting it done? What I mean is successfully eliminating a persistent source of agitation? I am not making a moral judgment here. I'm simply wondering something different than usual is happening.

Here in America we are used to thinking it is native born patriots that are considered by "our government" (the usurpers) to be the "persistent problem". What if that whole scenario got upended? And patriots thought there was a way to permanently, lastingly clear out some chronic rabble rousers in "high places". I do not advocate violence, just a change in thinking.

>>19934319

>>19934319

>Incoherent unrelated thoughts may be an harbinger for schizophrenia.

Coherent ideas of a new nature may be a harbinger for change. Are you paid to post here?

https://www.komu.com/news/state/lawyers-for-religious-leaders-challenging-missouri-abortion-ban-say-law-imposes-beliefs-on-everyone/article_9dd84c17-0556-5344-9fa1-46652119e5cd.html

https://www.komu.com/news/state/lawyers-for-religious-leaders-challenging-missouri-abortion-ban-say-law-imposes-beliefs-on-everyone/ (Without stringer but you'll need to navigate to the story.)

Lawyers for religious leaders challenging Missouri abortion ban say law imposes beliefs on everyone

As far as imposing beliefs on everyone: Not quite. The law was passed by the legislature and apparently only went into effect when/if Roe was overturned. These "religious leaders" don't want people of faith to have viewpoints considered or discussed in public. They want to "separate" religion from every other aspect of life, which is not possible or desirable. If they don't like the law they could do what most every other regular person does and vote for something else, but no they want a judge to PERMANENTLY prevent the state from acting on the law passed by elected representatives.

Quote: "Thirteen Christian, Jewish and Unitarian Universalist leaders filed suit in January seeking a permanent injunction barring Missouri from enforcing its abortion law and a declaration that provisions violate the Missouri Constitution."

>>19934472

Exactly. "Religious leaders" wanting to impose their beliefs but projecting their own evil on the electorate.

>>19934497

Better late than never?

>>19934509

Alleluia!

https://www.komu.com/news/nationworld/amazon-pulling-seven-brands-of-eye-drops-after-fda-warning/article_4abd3313-093f-55b9-bf62-d98952533172.html

https://www.komu.com/news/nationworld/amazon-pulling-seven-brands-of-eye-drops-after-fda-warning/ (Without stringer, so you'll have to navigate to the story.)

This is a big deal. The FDA is slow walking this.

The article has this to say about a previous recall:

"In February, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention urged health care providers and patients to avoid using EzriCare eye drops after an investigation into bacterial contamination linked with over 80 infections across 18 states."

"The infections involved a rare strain of the drug-resistant bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa that had never before been identified in the US. Four deaths were reported, along with 14 instances of vision loss and four cases in which eyeballs had to be surgically removed."

I guess people actually need an immune system after all. Too bad their "government" gave the VAIDS.