>>19963118 lb
Hard AI is another fraud
$$$$$
also used for fear pron
I think you are incorrect too
and you say you didn't read the book?
He was attacked for this book
so I think you are BS
maybe cause he was visiting or whatever.
His argument is around closed vs. open systems.
So you're claiming his "formal logic" is closed; is that it?
You can't reduce his argument to "absurd" if you never read the book
keke
rilly?
yes, the argument is short.
It's like Trump
When he proves them wrong, it's very short.
Also, it predicted the fact that they never achieved hard AI
They are lying for $$$
Minksky was pissed since it was supposed to be done by '01
Minsky changed the rules of the Turning Test - because machine / software combos failed
year after year after year after year.
So it's announced as completed.
?
naw.
That's gotta be proved.
It has to be more than a claim.
We just take official word that its done?
As far as I know the bots are crap and fuck up
People who write software will tell you the same thing.
sorry if I mis-understood.
Thanks for the clarification.
Have you ever noticed how how a computational machine grinds to a halt sometimes and has to be restarted?
The machine fails to restart itself in that condition.
It could be a physical possibility.
Anything is possible?
That's theoretical.
If it could be done they should just do it; they haven't been able to.
I wonder why.
The set of the true answers is tiny compared to the set of possible false answers?
would you agree?
I know. They only "pass" by cheating.
yes, DJT , according to the original vid by "joe"? was asked to join the plan, by the people doing it.
"Joe M" whatever that is?
people compete over notables
It's because he could be $$$
News Agency makes $$$
New Agency different from Aggregator
Aggregator - garbage in, garbage out.
NOAM is a FRAUD
working for the MAN; poseur
*The File Denial Ends Here: the CIA /did /have a dossier on Noam Chomsky.
/The Cable's /John Hudson: *"For years, the Central Intelligence Agency
denied it had a secret file on MIT professor and famed dissident Noam
Chomsky. But a new government disclosure obtained by /The Cable/ reveals for
the first time that the agency did in fact gather records on the anti-war
iconoclast during his heyday in the 1970s. The disclosure also reveals that
Chomsky's entire CIA file was scrubbed from Langley's archives, raising
questions as to when the file was destroyed and under what authority. The
breakthrough in the search for Chomsky's CIA file comes in the form of a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. For years, FOIA requests to the CIA garnered the same denial:
"We did not locate any records responsive to your request." The denials were
never entirely credible, given Chomsky's brazen anti-war activism in the 60s
and 70s – and the CIA's well-documented track record of domestic espionage
in the Vietnam era. But the CIA kept denying, and many took the agency at its
word. Now, a public records request by FOIA attorney Kel McClanahan reveals a
memo between the CIA and the FBI that confirms the existence of a CIA file on
Chomsky. Dated June 8, 1970, the memo discusses Chomsky's anti-war activities
and asks the FBI for more information about an upcoming trip by anti-war
activists to North Vietnam. The memo's author, a CIA official, says the trip
has the "ENDORSEMENT OF NOAM CHOMSKY" and requests "ANY INFORMATION" about
the people associated with the trip. */Read the rest at The Cable, here. [6]
/*
http://mileswmathis.com/chom.pdf
There's always some important info in comic books?
Thinking of this:
Criticism of Turing Test.
-
Turing was gay (non sequitur)
fallacy , irrelevant to argument
-
It's subjective.
That's false.
The human subjects either suss out the fraud (withing a certain time limit) Or without time limit
The original test had no time limit.
Or they don't (i.e. fooled by the machine)
None of that is subjective? Other than, if you boil it all downeverythingcould be argued as subjective - so "subjective" fails as a criticism ?
Epistemology.
First Turing test was about sex. He revised it, refined it later.
Question was:
can you tell gender by conversation just exchanging notes
Everybody here fails, cause presumably there's women here all the time who aren't detected?
Turing Test fails to detect gender. But succeeds to detect/ (or detect lack of) consciousness.
Lack of evidence does not equal evidence of lack.
But just coincidentally bots fail 100% eventually (usually sooner than later)
Web Pages written by AI are really poor.
I guess their money saving schemes are ultimately a fail?
and also the working of the unconscious via GRAPHICS? and/or there's a lot of occultist in the comic book business?
Just reading some excepts from Roman documents.
If you had a book on witchcraft back then, you were put to death. Depending on your status, it would be quick and clean or brutal.
That's where "Witchhunt" came from? You have a book on occultism and they kill you.
Capital crime.
there IS NO ai, you fucking retard, it's what i've been saying. just because some media pinhead call something AI doesn't mean that it IS ai
true
Batman - CNN evidence will get you banned. just sayn'
actually no.
The human is qualitatively different from computational machine.
The body is a "machine" of some kind. And materialists (who claim there is no spirir) believe they can create life via replicating the human body in a perfect way.
They need to use life to create life though (no creation from scratch) It's done with breeding / biological manipulation.
Also, if you ever noticed when the spirit leaves the body - no body wants it in the house anymoar.
I believe DNA is alive.
It's likely some kind of antennae?
Can they take it to enliven a clone?
The main project of the transhumanists, according to occultist Rudolf Steiner, is to separate the human from our spiritual nature. To break our connection with that realm.
https://tora3.com/video/36ab9b3e8ea6421e89badab1a0010662
"DNA is alive"
?
Steiner on the purpose of the injections ("vaccines")
from over 100 years ago~
so it's said
anon is less than a Steiner scholar….
but anyway that's out there.
And "Dark Journalist" does some really good work.
dede image from q crumbs is about Illegals voting
And why the Dems absolutely need their illegal votes to win.
To add: In districts where Trump-haters rule,
there are thousands of newly arrived colonists from mezo-american - many appear "meztisto" "Indian" they appear to be related to mayans.
by their body type, face, clothing, etc.
For what it is, fine.
PART 2
AMERICAN BLACKSare freezing to death in the streets!
~with a black mayor?
THE MONEY FOR THEM IS BEING STOLEN
While money is being thrown at the newly arrived.
THEY are Crying and freezing to death as Winter approaches
Are they going to disappear as homeless apparently have, in SanFran?
"Out of sight, out of mind"
They want to vote; They want to change the world for the better.
Why wouldn't they? And they do.
DIDNT BLACK LIVES MATTER?
Listening to Tucker in LasVegas; he was very upset.
He described a new kind of lying, where the liars are caught, yet are unashamed and go on to boldly claim you are the liar - then Tucker goes on to describe a death cult, who are the same breed, same people; hateful leaders who revel in death and destruction.
very upsetting.
Have to keep one's cool and keep thinking of God and thinking of how to help.
(The "Galactic Federation" IMO is load of crap - government front.
They say "it's over" "do nothing"? They think they are in a Star Trek movie? LARPERS)
We all have to be better Generals.
And take care of our people.
Craziness. Black woman all over the TV commercials and Movies.
exalted, while white men are derided.
And black men dying on the street.
fuck oprah
and all the power-hungry sold-out black women
The Hispanic trump-haters who care only for "their own;" they can take a hike too.
The black women with power don't seem to care about men, unless they dress-up as woman?
How far does their ancestry of the prominent powerful ones go back as Americans?
Including MIKE - who wants to be POTUS?!
Like with Kamala; one generation only?
And they pretend to rescue or "correct" American's alleged racism; and do nothing about the Black American homelessness?
Bring in Hispanics and spoil them (throwing money around), colonize (they aren't planning to leave ever, BTW, so "migrant" is a misnomer) and set-up the new comers in businesses?
All happening.
what happened to the black men?
Black and AngloWhite Americans have lived and worked here together for hundreds of years;
Fought a war for their/our freedom; both sides.
Can we care about each other - as Americans, more than for the newly arrived?
"black lives matter" ?
All lip service for these allegedly "radical" and virtue-signalling opportunists (of any race or ethnicity.)
One point though, power-people (government) pulling this horror are less than American; they display total dis-loyalty - and to the Veterans especially.
link was pb