Anonymous ID: 5e7693 Nov. 30, 2023, 5:07 a.m. No.20002409   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2426

Consider.

 

The CIA emerged in 'The New World' after a few hundred years and look how corrupt and evil it is.

Imagine how corrupt MOSSAD must be given it emerged in 'The Old World' after many thousands of years.

 

Pedowood/Hollyweird, without exception, glorifies both intel agencies with stories portraying them as vital, last chance of fighting evil, 'cool', and full of strong intelligent characters, meanwhile they repeatedly portray the military as the source of ptsd victims, mass shooters, mysogynists, alcoholics, immoral killers of women and children, and full of low IQ dregs of society.

 

Q was right, it's who they try to make you trust the most who are guilty of the worst sin.

Anonymous ID: 5e7693 Nov. 30, 2023, 5:44 a.m. No.20002592   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/3838012-kissinger-admits-he-was-wrong-on-ukraine-what-about-taiwan/

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/henry-kissinger-mass-immigration-of-people-with-different-values-a-grave-mistake

Anonymous ID: 5e7693 Nov. 30, 2023, 6:14 a.m. No.20002732   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Pierre Poilievre gives a PERFECT definition of 'woke' and response to smear, when asked to define 'woke' and being asked to 'backtrack and apologize' (notice a pattern by the radical authoritarian left? Always presuming moral high ground and demanding to be apologized to?) for characterizing the CRTC as a small group of privileged insiders closest to the Prime Minister.

 

"Woke has one purpose, only one purpose. Plenty of pretexts, but only one purpose: CONTROL. It is designed to divide people by race, by gender, by ethnicity, by religion, by vaccine status, and any other way they can divide people into groups. Because why? Then you can justify having a government to control all those groups. No more woke, we need freedom!"

 

That's fucking awesome.

Anonymous ID: 5e7693 Nov. 30, 2023, 6:35 a.m. No.20002831   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3016 >>3083

>>20002681

Has anyone ever posted the sauce attributing that quote to Alinksy? I keep seeing this meme as if he said it, but I can't find the sauce anywhere.

 

It's almost as if there are shills who want to trick anons into posting that meme so as to then justify an antithesis of criticizing critics of Alinsky.

 

Here is Alinsky's book "Rules For Radicals":

 

https://chisineu.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/saul-alinsky-rules-for-radicals-1989.pdf

 

404 not found.