First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/
It depends on the Judge
Attorney's help gather campaign funds for Judges to get re-elected
You want to hire an attorney who has helped fund the Judge's campaign for your best chance at "Justice".
So, question #2 should be, "Which of the Judges do you own with campaign finance blackmail?"
>Stake
>Zionism
Stake
Overview
A stake is a group of local Church congregations. A stake generally consists of about 3,000 to 5,000 members in five to ten congregations.
Related Topics
Zion
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/stake?lang=eng
Remember when 8Chan was, "The last bastion of Free Speech on the Internet"?
Those were the days…
All true. However, unlike you and your friends, Anon knows how to make a woman have multiple orgasms, and for that bit of wisdom, anon is truly blessed beyond measure.
All Links (pb)
There's a whole "How to Bake" post. Takes <5 mins to learn
>>17322317 Baking & Noting Resources Anonymous 08/09/22 (Tue) 11:38:128db5be (1) No.17322317 [Last50 Posts]>>17322485 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Come bake with us
This thread gives detailed info on how to bake & take notes, also tips. Contents: >>17322485, My First Bake: >>17322491, E-baking >>17322518
Anon bakes when the Baker's Union falls into a Diabetic Coma and fails to prepare new bread.
Don't ask
Just do.
And make your own banner
The BU can't stop you.
It's not a club
Anon doesn't bake for "Thanks"
Anon bakes for Bread, which is the point.
If you don't see anyone announcing that they're baking a new bread by post ~700, then feel free to announce that your baking and bake away.
Anon bakers don't need to share their email address with the Cabal and get a "nickname" to Bake.
Nicknames are given to the Traitors who hate the Freedom of Speech.
>Will you bake?
Maybe
Bible verses and baker's union bickering isn't notable, so anon would likely eBake if anon decided to.
Anon doesn't usually read Notables anyway because they often Overshadow the actual anons posting in here.
(It can't be NOTABLE if it get's deleted, so "notables" are already curated prior to Notetaking.)
Which "auto-delete" category of YOURS did this fit into?
>It would be nice if you could bake this daily bread, anon.
That's very kind anon.
Anon is truly humbled by the ask.
Anon has an IRL in a hour, so we'll see how the timing lines up.
Then why did you label all these as CP when you deleted them?
Anon doesn't acknowledge "rules" not based in The Law.
Anon is happy to defer to (1c8e14) who seems to have the concept well at hand.
You gonna bake, anon1c8e14?
>https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino/posts/111514869928717826
The crosses we bear are our Daily Burdens
Many of us are Burdened by the same "label of transgression" and subsequent shunning from the Politically Correct society. Most bear their burdens alone, but rarely solely.
Some anons pepper their language with "fucks" for added flavor which brings the cries of, "Shush, don't say that. The children might hear you." And so they are tongue-tied by Satan.
Some anons drink caffeinated beverages, which as any Student of the DARE program know is, "A Drug that Drug Abusers use to kill themselves with because they are bad people."
Some anons smoke, "the devil's lettuce," or even WORSE, literal Cowboy Killers (Marlboro Reds).
But the anons who wear the "scarlet letters" are the anons who are castigated as sexual deviants for breaking the "Missionary Position Only within the Bondage of a Church Blessed, State Endorsed "Till death do we part" Covenant" rules about how humans are allowed to enjoy the sextheir Creatorgave them.
So, what's to unify the Anon's rejected from "The Kingdom" via Censorship?
What "symbol" won't they destroy to keep anon's disunified?
Anon doesn't know.
So anon will keep screaming anonymously into the void while watching the water.
>Lieutenant Ted Macie, an active-duty officer in the Navy Medical Service Corps and whistleblower, has been barred from accessing his work computer by the Department of Defense (DOD).
Information Warfare
You know, they could probably make those metrics LOOK a little better if they just took moar Motrin, drank moar water, ate moar broccoli, and ran moar marathons.
"You people really need to start taking your health seriously and get down and do some push-ups. I want 100 pushups for every member of this unit that has had a heart-attack, so maybe you can learn to stay in shape, and not have heart attacks."
>true but in the meantime we have to fight against the censorship of free speech
Which really just means speaking your mind, enduring the deletions, correcting the record, and speaking your mind again.
It's THE DELETERS who alter History to fit "a narrative".
Can you even imagine being a 10th Century Monk, sent down to the archives to "look something up" and just randomly ~~deleting~~ things out of old texts or "altering" translations of ancient document just because the Raining Monarch wants it to "read differently"?
That's kinda how $cience works.
When the numbers don't motivate the Investors to award The Grant…well, the Numbers get fixed by "nameless, faceless, assistants"….
Reporting and Deleting has been working so well for 6000 years.
Let's do moar of that.
Because sanity must be earned or something.
Why should anon care what anon does and doesn't "agree" with.
"Congress shall make no law"
Means exactly what it says.
Have you heard the Good News?
Censorship was rejected by the Founding Fathers and the Freedom of Speech, and the unalienable right to ignore Church Policy, was Well Established in the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution which was ratified as The Law of The Land on December 15, 1791.
If the only solution to Censorship, is moar Censorship, then let the Reporting & Deleting of Shillery by anons begin?
>> ANYTHING to stop this board from being stable and productive for 2024 election games.
>Uhh.
No.
This isn't Campaign HQ for The Mormons.
Government worship gets you The Vaxx Mandate, Sheep of Melchizedek.
Government isn't the Creator
We The People created the Government
We The People are the Creator
Board Operator is violating the Welcome Notice on 8Kun
Should QR be reported for deletion until QR comes into compliance with 8Kun Policies?
Welcome to 8kun. Speak freely - legally.
On 8kun, you can create your own imageboard for free with no experience or programming knowledge needed.
Warning: some boards on 8kun might have content of an adult, mature, or offensive nature. Please cease use of this website if you are under 18 years of age and/or if it is illegal for you to view such content. On 8kun, boards and posts are user-created and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the 8kun Administration. Any content that violates the laws of the United States of America will be deleted and the poster will be banned.
https://8kun.top/index.html
Skipping the 1st Amendment isn't Optional.
Anon hasn't seen any CP on 8Kun ever.
You lie by obfuscating Legal Definitions found in the Law
Hmm. Well, then
Can anon's get behind a board called
8kun dot top//FreeSpeechResearch/
Or some variant
That follows 8Kun Policy?
Because QResearch is useless
There was no sexual activity, which is Prong #2 of the 3 prong Obscenity test found in Miller v California.
However, the Court acknowledged "the inherent dangers of undertaking to regulate any form of expression," and said that "State statutes designed to regulate obscene materials must be carefully limited."[15] The Court, in an attempt to set such limits, devised a set of three criteria which must be met for a work to be legitimately subject to state regulation:
whether the average person, applying contemporary "community standards," would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
whether the work depicts or describes, in an offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions, as specifically defined by applicable state law (the syllabus of the case mentions only sexual conduct, but excretory functions are explicitly mentioned on page 25 of the majority opinion); and
whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California
There was nothing that, "depicts or describes, in an offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions"
> The current batch is more borderline
Board Log says this post was deleted as CP
So, you wanna keep beating your head against the wall?
Why was this Deleted, Anons?
Only the poster is responsible for the post, anon
Collective Guilt is a feature of Communist Indoctrination
Public Schools, the Military and Corporate Employment love Group Punishment