>>20094469 (pb)

what it seems like to me is that you are being what you are accusing me of.

calling me a 'satanist'?

really?

someone who is actually concerned with the confusion of those addicted to sexuality.

you have no love for Jesus that I see. What I see is 'the accuser' someone who loves to tell other people that they are evil and going to hell.

my concern is that 'blessing' people addicted to sex and living in a sexual relationship is going to cause them more harm than good.

so I say 'well they'd have to be in a celibate relationship'

You love to quote stuff, but you seem to lack any love in your heart.

PS: Jesus speaks for Jesus, not you.

>>20094658

the specifics of 'blessings by a priest' within the context of the Roman Catholic Church.

and you can have your point of view but the facts are that I'm not talking about your pagan world. I'm talking about people committed to a holy life and who want a blessing from a Catholic priest.

PS: celibacy is a thing and some people can do it and don't need to do what you suggest.

>>20094673

curse is broken

speak your vodoo no more.

I'm clear about what I'm discussing.

you're being an agitatator and a jerk

>>20094674

no I'm not.

you're trying to start a fight

I'm discussing the real issues with saying that a priest can willy nilly give a blessing to a gay couple.

if they are sexual then the priest would have to council them that they need to stop and become celebate.

you claim as if you are an authority but you're just someone who learned enough to say stuff that you think will trigger faithful people into shame.

but the real wages of sin are clear for all to see.

listen to you the 'one in him and water stands for people' but you ignore the 'go and sin no more' part

if you don't believe that sin destroys people, don't expect me to follow along with your pretense to speak for Jesus.

even if you know that sin destroys people, you don't speak for Jesus. You speak for yourself.

>>20094724

so you're a bigot and now you make it clear.

I was always discussing what Pope Francis and his cohort released today about 'blessing' same sex couples.

ah, and look at you showing the plank in your eye by accusing me of having one in mine.

I'm very aware of what my issues are.

you seem to me a selfrightous bigot who is here just to distress people.

>>20094687

>(You)

those who one post butt in with a trite non sequetor are merely shilling for distress.

>>20094760

you make vauge accusations by posting trite quotes from long dead philiosphers in a context where they have no purpose to try to shame others.

as far as if I understand your motives: who cares? you're a waste of time.

>>20094808

and thus you show your self.

is that a self portrait?

>>20095205

you have your world view where you know what you think you know and you say God is what you want God to be.

other people live differently and you don't respect the ancient institutions that were established in the very long ago.

but what you also do is basically bad mouth and slander traditions and people of faith.

Priests bless people and it means something.

you demand everyone have your world view or it's 'superstitious mumbo jumbo'.

but really what your point of view seems to be : whatever I think is true, I don't really believe in anything.

>>20095362

the false stuff printed by supremacist bigots

>>20095364

why is it the united states problem to defend the fleets of cabal oligarchs who treat as their chumps?

>>20095375

posted this last bread.

don't pretend that IDF are blameless angels

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256303/pope-francis-comments-on-attack-on-catholic-church-in-gaza

IDF shows their psychopatic nature

from the article:

“A mother and her daughter, Mrs. Nahida Khalil Anton and daughter Samar Kamal Anton, were killed and other people injured by sharpshooters, while going to the bathroom,” the pope continued.