Bakers are warm!
>Wrong Olga
Incorrect. Olga Katysheva followed by Olga Vishnevskaya (Pepelangelo) are the original Olgas of /qresearch. Anon has no objections to adding additional Olgas.
> unofficial board mascot
Pathetic newfag lacks institutional knowledge and board memory.
>overrated.
Not disputed. To the extent one Anon can speak for many Anons we accept and respect currently outstanding breasts while respecting those equally oustanding breasts who have gone before and were appreciated as the best available due to times and technology.
Some Anons noticed orthodontics before tats. Anons remember. Olga did this [picrel] (she is an Anon):
You will have to ask Anons, Anon. Olga Katysheva started her journey about the time CBTS started with Q. There was a 'Boobs for Baker' tradition. Many Anons posted pictures of Olga. Presumably, many Anons' breasts were volunteered to Thank our Bakers. Were yours?
You still haven't grasped the 'biggest drop on pol' though, have you?
https://qalerts.net/?q=biggest+drop+on+pol
>CBTS was a little before my time and only Tranime of all bakers would have any interest in my bewbs.
>How many anons inflate their tits for vainglory and spread their images far and wide over the internet?
That's not what you asked, Anon.
So you can understand why Anons posted 'anonymous' or social media-sourced 'boobs' to thank our bakers rather than personally sourced images. Doesn't that explain why a young 'anonymous' woman from Russia had her Instagram images appropriated to 'Thank the Baker' on CBTS and 8chan and 8kun? Her life, her plans, her orthodontics, her alleged augmentations, and her well-being were secondary to Anons' appreciation of images of her breasts?
Anons chose Olga. Olga did not choose Anons.
> early on i mentioned Q anon
/qresearch is about the writings of Q, not about the societal or media-derivative called 'Q anon' or 'QAnon'.
That is not a serious question, Anon. If there is something you do not understand you are free to ask.
>Red folder, January 6th
10 U.S. Code Chapter 13 - INSURRECTION
10 U.S. Code § 254 - Proclamation to disperse
Whenever the President considers it necessary to use the militia or the armed forces under this chapter, he shall, by proclamation, immediately order the insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably to their abodes within a limited time.
> a crime they've been acquitted of in a criminal trial?
They can't. It is called 'double jeopardy'. They can be tried on Federal charges for the same crime or other crimes, or tried for damages in civil court.
A successful Instagram model, at the least. /qresearch 'Boobs for Baker' finalist nominee for 2018 and 2019 with many honorable mentions. An Anon favorite due to nostalgia for the boards' heyday.
>she shouldn't be spammed like she is.
Pick your own 'Boobs for Baker' images and show Anons what you've got. In the mean time Anons post worthy images to thank our Bakers.
She is not naked. And there are no credible allegations that she is a prostitute or 'loose'. If her image disturbs you it may be that you are not as attractive or perhaps not as appealing to men, Anon. How are her images different than those you welcome at your home in the mail or on your television?
>Because I'm not a sheep.