>>20145700

Anon opines

Olga is without question, fren to anons, support for entire board mission(dogs, memes, bakes and prayers) and welcome persona here in the kun.

However, by definition and common sense understanding of basic English, Olga cannot be considered anon as she is anything but anonymous in her identity.

only Olga as in muh shit, o7

>>20145937

It's the systems way of saying we know, but we got enough payment to allow it to become a civil matter of guilt instead of criminal.

>>20145975

That sounds like the government