Anonymous ID: 7a7e3f Jan. 2, 2024, 3:10 p.m. No.20172104   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2115 >>2153 >>2183

Retired Oakland judge pushes wild new theory about infamous Lindbergh baby kidnapping claiming abduction was a HOAX and the wrong man was executed

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12919347/Retired-Oakland-judge-pushes-wild-new-theory-infamous-Lindbergh-baby-kidnapping-claiming-abduction-HOAX-wrong-man-executed.html

 

  • A retired California judge has suggested Charles Lindbergh may have offered his child for medical experiments faking the 1932 kidnapping to cover up the death

  • Lise Pearlman had outlined the wild new theory in a book in which she alleges, Lindbergh collaborated with biologist Alexis Carrel for experimental surgery

  • Advocates, including the Innocence Project, are pushing for the case to be reopened emphasizing the need for DNA testing and a potential mock trial

 

>Pearlman's theory, which she claims is based on more than a decade of forensic investigation, proposes that Lindbergh may have allowed his son to have been used in medical experiments.

 

>Pearlman suggests Lindbergh might have even collaborated with Carrel to conduct an experimental operation on the child, knowing that it would result in his death.

 

>The alleged motive was to revolutionize surgery by preserving organs outside the body for transplantation.

 

'He was home when it happened. He should have been a suspect.'

At the time of the kidnapping, Lindbergh was simply too famous to be considered as a suspect. His fame even allowed him to help lead the investigation.

 

<Historians note Lindbergh and Carrel's shared advocacy for eugenics - weeding out human deficiencies so they won't be inherited.

 

Pearlman contends that Lindbergh viewed his sick child, who had an abnormally large sized head, as disposable.

 

'My theory is that the child was operated on. We think at the very least that his carotid artery and probably his thyroid were taken out and kept viable for 30 days. We think he died on the operating table,' Pearlman said.

 

'And I think Carrel conducted the operation with Lindbergh's permission — and Lindbergh was likely present at the operation.'

 

Hauptmann, according to Pearlman, was an unwitting victim, caught by police after using traceable ransom money.

 

'A lot of leads weren't followed…'

Anonymous ID: 7a7e3f Jan. 2, 2024, 3:13 p.m. No.20172123   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2334

>genocide

>infanticide

 

Baby formula recalled over concerns of possible contamination with bacteria that causes brain swelling and seizures in infants

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12919257/baby-formula-recalled-testing-positive-bacteria-seizures.html

 

  • Recall applies to Nutramigen Powder - formula for infants with cow milk allergy

  • The bacteria Cronobacter sakazakii can cause brain swelling and seizures

 

More than 675,000 cans of baby formula are being recalled over concerns they've been contaminated with a bacteria that could cause life-threatening health complications in infants.

 

Reckitt/Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN) announced over the weekend it was voluntarily recalling select cans of its specialty infant formula, Nutramigen Powder - baby formula made for infants with an allergy to cow's milk - because they could be contaminated with the bacteria Cronobacter sakazakii.

 

The company said products sold outside of the United States tested positive for the bacteria, but it has not been found in any batches tested in the US.

Anonymous ID: 7a7e3f Jan. 2, 2024, 3:16 p.m. No.20172146   🗄️.is 🔗kun

EPHRAIM HARDCASTLE: Rumours swirl that Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson are thinking about marrying again… But were they pushed by the Palace to divorce in the first place?

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-12920361/prince-andrew-sarah-ferguson-marry-rumours.html

 

Fresh rumours swirl that Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew are thinking about marrying again. But should they have divorced in the first place? Sarah's father, Major Ronald Ferguson, blamed the Palace for pushing them into it, suggesting that an extended separation was what they wanted. And Prince Philip and Princess Margaret were keen to evict Sarah from the family, a source says. They brought the Queen round to their way of thinking. When Charles and Diana divorced in 1996, the Yorks, according to my source, were 'persuaded' to do the same. Now the greatest obstacle to remarriage (Prince Philip) is gone, is the way clear to retie the knot?

 

>pending Epstein list revelations, right on time