gotta picrel question anons

the process of ice melting reduces the size/volume of water if anons correct, since 90% of glaciers are underwater then if this volume would shrink then how would it impact global water level, cosindering the water displacement parameter? the glaciers ar about 19% of global landmass

(all of this "hypothesis" is derived from chat with chatgpt), the only thing that would technically impact global water level positively(raising it) is the the glaciers landmass above the current global level right? i think the equilibrium would be therefore bending towards negative. However the consequences of pouring the polar icewater into oceans would cause a load of chaos on climate.

So, my hypothesis is - if glaciers would melt, we would drown, but, there would be shitload of climate changes (tornadoes etc)

>>20176648

>we wouldn't drown

>>20176656

yeah i get what u say its the primary cause of every climate happening, however scaring the masses they will drown when icecaps melt is retarded imho, only climate changes (air mixing temperature evaporation etc)

>>20176662

what i mean, id like to check if this assumption is correct, glaciers are almoast 20% of global landmass (in volume), 90% of this 20% landmass is BELOW the global water level, when this melts it reduces in volume , then i would argue that in fact the global water level would drop down instead of flood everything

>>20176687

considering the WATER DISPLACEMENT phenomenon

>>20176703

id argue that the weight stays the same only volume reduces

>>20176856

water does not become heavier when it freezes