>>20209378 (pb)

>>20209368 (pb)

you are changing the subject.

I'm talking about organized protestors who agree to break the law and violate the right to feely travel on the highways and byways.

you claim it's OK for you and your special frens to do it because you have your special frens in the DA offices and dont' get charge.

but in fact, even if it were legal, it's still abusive and violating the rights of others to travel freely.

they have to go to the hospital, they can't.

they need to go to the store, they can't.

if or if not governmental bodies do stuff that violates is inconsequential in this argument.

you support abuse of innocent people who merely want to go about their day in their pursuit of happiness or to do what they need to do.

and thus you support violating their rights.

that governments sometimes to it doesn't absolve you of the crime of abusing the rights of others.

PS: if you got a permit for your march it's fine to do it. but they don't.

admit that you violate the rights of others, reform, and repent.

>>20209392

civil disobedience doesn't involve violating the rights of those who are passing by.

you try to justify your special status as if you're abusive nature is a virtue, when, in fact, it shows you as criminally motivated and unconcerned with the rights of others.

that's not just cowardice (your word) it's also criminal.

if you end up in jail for doing it it's your own fault and you will have to pay the time.

>>20209439

no ,anon, you're a criminally minded operator without respect for the rights of man.

you diflect and change the subject and justify your criminal nature by changing the subject.

if you end up in jail it's your own fault.

>>20209507

by you, anon.

Filtered.

you are also a conflict monger probably without a soul (A bot)

'civil disobedience is what this country was founded on' says the marxist.

but try going against what your handlers and enablers demand of you and see how quickly they throw you under the bus.

they will call you a useful idiot.

when Thourough did his bit he violated the law and gleefully let them arrest them and put him in jail making them look foolish. He didn't violate the rights of all the people in Concord, close down Route 2A, and treat the authorities like they were bad people.

the marxist trains the useful idiot in false narratives and doesn't show them the truth.

Civil Disobedience is not anarchists cry-babying for what they want.

when you block highways and roads illegally it's not civil disobedience.

how could it be civil if it violates the civil rights of others?

civil disobedience does not violate the rights of others.

the jingo to use isn't 'civil disobedience' in that case. When you block the public ways and violate others civil rights that is 'uncivil criminality'

marxists can't handle being explained to about how what they think is pious is actually criminal and abusive.

>>20209610

I'm establishing a narrative that explains why blocking highways is incorrect.

I think it's important to do because they 'chat bots' are using the alternative marxist narrative, and that one needs to be debunked.

these marxists need to understand that when they abuse the rest of us they are behaving as criminal.

the false piety of pretense of 'protest' needs debunking.

that's OK, right?

>>20209638

I'm not establishing it for them, I'm establishing it for those who want to debunk it when confronted by the false pious criminal abusers: at the school, in debate.

obviously these ones here are not in 'learn' mode.